Atheism is a philosophy of negation, devoid of an argument. Why do then atheists continue their harping? [Spirituality & Religion]

A premise, or a conclusion is something one arrives to through an argument. Atheists, however, try to arrive to one through negation.

The sheer simplicity of the athiest's ignorance is admirable. But it shows they're not philosophically inclined, but ideologically.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

“A premise, or conclusion is something one arrives to though an argument”.

There seems to be a lot of people on here recently who speak about atheism without really knowing what it is.

Atheists aren’t trying to arrive at a premise/conclusion. Atheism is solely a rejection of the proposition “a God exists”. That’s it.

We’re not concluding anything. We’re not positing anything. There are no ethical codes, doctrines or dogmas attached to atheism. We’re simply rejecting a claim.

I think you need to be careful with that feigned intellectual superiority you have; it’s not becoming. You find it “admirable”? Who are you trying to impress?