Atheism is a philosophy of negation, devoid of an argument. Why do then atheists continue their harping? [Spirituality & Religion]

A premise, or a conclusion is something one arrives to through an argument. Atheists, however, try to arrive to one through negation.

The sheer simplicity of the athiest's ignorance is admirable. But it shows they're not philosophically inclined, but ideologically.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

PrivatePeeks · 26-30, F

The type of atheist you're familiar with sits back and watches other beliefs fail; offering no proofs in support of his position. Yet there is another type of atheist: one that adopts an improved proving system and offers deductive arguments plus supportive evidence. Be careful in condemning all atheists.

Wifebeater · M

@PrivatePeeks Please give me an example of the second type.

PrivatePeeks · 26-30, F

Are you familiar with the four belief classes and associated proving systems? If not, my answer would seem confusing.

Wifebeater · M

@PrivatePeeks Yeah go for it.

PrivatePeeks · 26-30, F

@Wifebeater You are familiar?

Wifebeater · M

@PrivatePeeks I'm not entirely sure. Are you referring to Saving Belief?

PrivatePeeks · 26-30, F

@Wifebeater

Class 'A' (Doubter)
Natural discontinuation/ the Assumptive system

Class 'B' (Dreamer)
Magical continuation/ the Permissive system

Class 'C' (Dabbler)
Magical discontinuation/ the Connective system

Class 'D' (Master)
Natural continuation/ the Tempered system

===============================================

You are very likely Class 'B', and resent Class 'A': it being the antithesis of your belief and proving system.

I am Class 'D'