This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
GJOFJ3 · 61-69, M
An expensive monument to the wasteful slaughter of beautiful wildlife
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SimplyTracie · 26-30, F
@TexChik If he ate the carcasses then it’s a good thing.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SimplyTracie · 26-30, F
@PissAndVinegar I agree.
What’s the trophy prove anyway? That with a gun, you can shoot and kill a deer? From a long distance away? Heck, anyone could do that. 🤦
What’s the trophy prove anyway? That with a gun, you can shoot and kill a deer? From a long distance away? Heck, anyone could do that. 🤦
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SimplyTracie · 26-30, F
It’s disgusting and morbid for sure.
TexChik · F
@PissAndVinegar obviously he’s not Russian , nor is there a bear in view. And Russian views are not exactly the standard by which Americans base their decisions on . Harvesting one “ trophy” animal in a life time is rare enough and it is considered as honoring the animal to preserve it in such a way as to display its natural beauty .
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
TexChik · F
@PissAndVinegar to you maybe . But hunters are free to honor their harvest in their own way. The taking of game animals for personal consumption is legal, monitored, beneficial to the species and the environment , not to mention the hunter . Financially hunters put billions back into the economy , and the money derived from licensing and taxes on hunting goods funds the government’s wildlife programs .