Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Something was mentioned about SW that can be easily taken care of.

It's true that Google as well as other search engines Index this site. Yet there is an option in the settings that can easily take care of that.

Scroll down to "Privacy settings" and expand that. Then scroll some more to "Your contents".


Select "No" on "Allow logged out users view your full Profile" .

This will not allow outside users nor search engines to see anything but your profile name and PFP.

Everything else it just won't be able to see, because there's nothing it can reference. There's just nothing there it can index.

Of course logged in users still can. Including blocked users if they already have a link to a post and that post isn't private or site private.

The last is as well an option. Yet it must be set every time you post.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@NerdyPotato Sorry for the delay. I wasn't notified. For some reason your reply was hiden.

The AI would need to have an account though and search engines really don't want to do that for legal reasons.

You see this site has the rights to all content.

As to the other part you are correct. Which is why I mentioned private and site global posts. Site global isn't seen even in the forums from outside.

Once anyone sets that before posting, even that can't be seen without being logged in.

Private posts only friends and followers can see.
@DeWayfarer limited and private posts can indeed never be indexed, but public posts can be both before and after changing this setting. So this really only makes it harder for non-member humans to get a full picture about you by browsing SW, not for AI to profile you or people using AI linking everything together. ☹ The only protection against that is changing the visibility of every post individually and that only works for new ones.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@NerdyPotato What is in the past will remain in the past though.

I have been archived by groups.google.com decades ago.

There's not a sole thing that I can do about it either, even though it was long before AI.

There comes a point where too much information is just too much even for AI. 🤷🏻‍♂

Google search won't show anything on this username before I came on this site no matter how much anyone looks.

BTW it's why I have those links in my about me! 🤣

Degbeme · 70-79, M
Very concerning. I don`t have FB and never will.
romell · 51-55, M
Welcome to the www first second to AI ..you are logged in you are no longer private everything about you is in public domain
And now I'm even more glad I no longer have a Facebook 😵‍💫🙈

Hell NO! I'm worried about my partner now bc he still has one and he's not a big photo person but his friends love tagging him in junk.😮
I wonder if anyone would use a social media site that doesn't allow you to upload, embed or link to any photos, audio or video at all, and all your interactions had to rely solely on writing and reading text. That's the only way you can truly stop this (account settings or whatnot don't mean much in the event of something like an unforeseen data breach, for example).

I'm surprised here when people post photos that even purport to be their adult-aged friends or relatives, and/or use the supposedly real names of these people ... like, do those people know this is happening, and do they consent to being named and depicted to a bunch of strangers o social sites? Even if the "real" names are invented pseudonyms (which in itself serves no purpose, it's just as easy to use pronouns and generic nouns), if you don't tell anyone that it gives the impression that you have no qualms about sharing other people's private / offline details on social networks without their consent.

If you point out to people that it's not cool to post pics of other people, of course they react negatively / brattily. And then of course you don't know if they're really sharing pics of people they know, or are just using random pics found on the Internet while spinning elaborate false stories.
class · F
If my kid were to be on social media it would be a question for sure

Did you know your profile is indexed publicly by google and it's AI? Ask

ExampleUsername similarworlds.com
Or
what can you tell me of ExampleUsername contributions on similarworlds.com
@class whaaatt, I didn't know that
class · F
@AbsolutelyFabulous

Who knows how long its been there, i mean probably since andrew (i think) announced public indexd across search engines starting with google

i found this out an somebody here claimed to have independently found out about it, then someone chimed in on her behalf. This user posts about shock value stuff alot.
Some1somewhere · 41-45, M
People shouldn’t post pics of their kids on social regardless of AI.. kids probably haven’t consented to it either..
Mrnotsonew · 61-69, M
Nope, kids dont need to be posted.
Every time I see someone post their kids pics on here it upsets me. We all know damn well this is a pedo hotspot.
We live in a sad world... It's nothing new that Facebook and other companies build profiles like that, but AI did make it easier for others to search through that too. And why is "who is that passenger" even a suggestion? Probably because enough people searched for that even before AI, and those skilled enough probably got the answer before AI too. But that doesn't mean any platform or tool should make it that easy.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
Welcome to Zuckerberg's wonderful privacy-safe world. What a dirtbag. AI not only collects this they store and sell the data.
Wallflow3r · 31-35, F
Easily solvable by either not posting pictures of your family or changing privacy settings to friends only.
Strictmichael75 · 61-69, M
Facebook and other social medias keep all your information and photos WITHOUT your permission
It’s disgraceful
Munumbis · 46-50, M
They're screwing themselves. Word will spread and people will be afraid to post anything at all.

 
Post Comment