Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Atheism is a rejection of the assertion, "there is a god," and it is NOT necessarily the belief that there isn't a god.

There is a pervasive misconception about atheists that goes as such: "Atheists believe there isn't a god. Therefore, they have just as much faith as any religious person." While that argument is valid, it's unsound; that is, the conclusion is ba<x>sed on the faulty assumption that atheists believe there isn't a god; while that certainly is the case for some (probably few, actually) atheists, it isn't the case for all atheists. I don't believe there's a god because I haven't been presented with reasonable, acceptable evidence for his existence, and so it would be unwarranted for me to assume that he doesn't exist. I reject the assertion, "there is a god," but, in so doing, I am NOT claiming that the assertion is false; I am essentially saying that I can't be sure that the assertion is true, and so I won't accept it as truth, and I can't justifiably claim that it's false. After all, absence of evidence is indeed not evidence of absence. Ya dig?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
aWomanExperiencedSomewhat
So what makes you want tobe called an atheist as opossedto an agnostic? I read about the negative atheism, but dont get the difference.
OrWhatever · 26-30, M
Although I'm starting to think that it would be better if I were called a negative atheist, you could call me an agnostic atheist. Agnosticism and atheism aren't mutually exclusive and neither are agnosticism and theism. My definition of agnostic atheist would be, "one who doesn't believe a god exists but doesn't claim to know that a god doesn't exist."
aWomanExperiencedSomewhat
okay. to me it still sounds like the same thing ;D but what ever feels right to you.
OrWhatever · 26-30, M
Haha. :)