Christians, I stand up for your right to be religious, but please know that you're wrong.
Please know that you're living in a fantasy land, and after you die nothing happens, stop been a f*cking child.
36-40, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
RationalCutie
Lol. The person who is wrong is the person who thinks that other people are wrong in this case....that'd be you if you couldn't follow.
No one knows what's going to happen. There are people who have stories of what it felt like when they died. They vary, some could be made up, but that's the only thing we can go on as evidence of an afterlife.
And, of course, if you're religious. You believe what you want to believe. Can anyone DISPROVE it?....No. No they can't. There's no way to prove/disprove it. It's logical.
So perhaps you need to grow up and realize this. ;D
No one knows what's going to happen. There are people who have stories of what it felt like when they died. They vary, some could be made up, but that's the only thing we can go on as evidence of an afterlife.
And, of course, if you're religious. You believe what you want to believe. Can anyone DISPROVE it?....No. No they can't. There's no way to prove/disprove it. It's logical.
So perhaps you need to grow up and realize this. ;D
madasalizard · 36-40, M
Stop been stupid, even if there was a god, he wants everyone to believe their isn't one, You do not have a singular shred of evidence. Also the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?
RSchuey
No, the burden of proof is on the person making the claims so he is 100% correct in stating that you are wrong because the religious present no evidence. Scientists use practicable recreateable logical methods before they call something true.
And It isn't his job to disprove it you buffoon, in order to make an acceptable claim of fact you have to prove it not disprove it.
Oh and yes they have proved that there is no afterlife in every current form of testing we know today, the only argument people can present is "well your not dead how do you know" which is pretty pathetic. sorry to break the bad news.
And It isn't his job to disprove it you buffoon, in order to make an acceptable claim of fact you have to prove it not disprove it.
Oh and yes they have proved that there is no afterlife in every current form of testing we know today, the only argument people can present is "well your not dead how do you know" which is pretty pathetic. sorry to break the bad news.
RationalCutie
Are you an idiot? Of course you are. Do YOU have evidence to disprove it? No you don't. NO ONE has tangible evidence (if you don't agree with the Bible) to prove or disprove His Existence. That's essentially what I'm saying. You can CHOOSE for yourself whether you want to believe or not. No one's forcing you (not in America at least) to believe. But to go around and say there ISN'T any evidence when YOU haven't found a way to disprove it is asinine. The absence of evidence does not mean that it is always the evidence of absence. Sometimes, it's just evidence. That depends on what you BELIEVE though. And no, your analogy is stupid (of course) since EVERYONE shouldn't be forced to believe in anything. There are those who believe in Fairies and those who don't. They can't be dis/proven either way but people have their reasons. Live and let live. Only rational people tend to see this logic though. You're irrational...obviously.
madasalizard · 36-40, M
You're delusional obviously.
RationalCutie
The burden of proof is on the person making claims. That's correct. His claim is that we're wrong. So he should provide the burden of proof. It doesn't only come onto Christians. Were WE making the claim in question? No we werent'. Oh..they've disproved that there is no afterlife in every current form of testing? Where's the evidence because that's a bunch of hogwash. What tests have they used? Scientists use the scientific method to test things that are tangible, loser. God isn't tangible so there is not way to test for His existence. Try again re-ward.
RationalCutie
You're nonsensical as it is seen. No one has completely disproven or proven the existence of ANY Deity due to the fact that Dieties can NOT be tested by scientific methods. LOL. It's funny because it's people like you who make Atheists look bad. They're more rational to see the truth in it.
RSchuey
The proclamation that i am an "idiot" and "irrational" are empty terms, just because i follow a logical system of thought that doesn't comply with yours that does not make me anything of derogatory terms. It gives me the ability to define you as irrational because i operate from facts which are directly relate to logic.
If life after death exists, then evidence should be there, tests have been done and there is none. So isn't it just more reasonable to conclude that there is not an afterlife.
You call me irrational from your position of pseudo science, but i am afraid ration is based on what the scientific community discovers, not what you decide to believe and defend in your own mind.
And yes people have plenty of evidence that leads to there not being a god, in fact the whole existence of us and our origins when analyzed tell us there is no REASON to believe there is a god whatsoever, (REASON being the key word there because that is where my viewpoint lies.)
Ready to join the rest of us in the real world? or are you going to try to defend something you have no REASON to assume.
If life after death exists, then evidence should be there, tests have been done and there is none. So isn't it just more reasonable to conclude that there is not an afterlife.
You call me irrational from your position of pseudo science, but i am afraid ration is based on what the scientific community discovers, not what you decide to believe and defend in your own mind.
And yes people have plenty of evidence that leads to there not being a god, in fact the whole existence of us and our origins when analyzed tell us there is no REASON to believe there is a god whatsoever, (REASON being the key word there because that is where my viewpoint lies.)
Ready to join the rest of us in the real world? or are you going to try to defend something you have no REASON to assume.
RationalCutie
You're not following a logical system. Everything that I've said has been logical. You're being irrational similar to him. They're not empty terms: they're the truth about you in my eyes. :) Again, WHAT tests? There is no way to test about life after death. Instead of saying it (providing the claim), it is up to YOU to show the burden of proof, right? So show it. The Scientific Community has not discovered nor disproven any life after death...because there is no WAY to. Try again. It doesn't matter what other people's reasons are. People have reasons for everything that they believe in. What matters is the fact that absolute doubt should be removed and in this scenario, it is not. I honestly believe that our intricate systems and existence actually PROVES that there is God. Try again. With evidence this time. :)