Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Notice Obama didn't care a fig about Syrians till he got the chance to bring them in as Democrat Party voters?

Despite a lot of advocacy in both US parties, he didn't try very hard to stop the conditions that were turning people into refugees.He doesn't want to pressure the wealthy Arab states to take the refugees, because he wants them on US voter rolls.He doesn't care about the possibilities of violence. He has released thousands of convicted criminal illegal aliens into the US instead of deporting therm. He doesn't care about us.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ScorpioSeven

One must be a CITIZEN of the USA, before being allowed to register to VOTE, Sir.

conceptualclarity · M

That can be arranged after a modest wait. Obama thinks down the road unlike the liberals who post here.

ScorpioSeven

Some folks speak of LIBERALS like they were a BAD thing. FREE SPEECH and FREEDOM of RELIGION are highly "liberal" or "radical" ideas.

conceptualclarity · M

Are you not paying attention to today's America? Liberals and radicals are by far the biggest enemies of freedom of speech and religion around. They are the ones who constantly call for people to be fired from their jobs for SAYING or posting on Facebook something that doesn't toe the progressive line. They are the ones who want the government to trample on religious people's consciences, as in the cases of Hobby Lobby and the Sisters of the Poor. They are the ones who want to jail or bankrupt businessmen who serve all customers but are not willing to do specific tasks that entangle them in homosexual "marriages". They are the ones who create "speech codes" on college campuses. They are the ones who create tiny areas on college campuses to be "free speech zones", oblivious to the fact that the Constitution makes the whole USA a "free speech zone." They are the ones who claim that the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment means that religious people have more limited rights of participation in public life.

ScorpioSeven

Assuming you're right (and you're NOT), then how do you explain the fact that a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT got RE-ELECTED POTUS in 2012?

I know... The election was RIGGED, right? (That's always the Conservative claim, when the BEST person wins. A classic example of the "Sour Grapes" mentality.)

conceptualclarity · M

He got elected by promising people free stuff, such as free birth control for women. And also by waging the dirtiest campaign in my life, combined with the extreme incompetence of the campaign by Romney, who refused to fight back against the smears and refused to run against Obama's whole target-rich environment, instead confining himself to the one issue of jobs. The best person won only if you count political ruthlessness toward "best".

ScorpioSeven

Well, the MAJORITY disagreed with you, and agreed with Obama, which is why he's the POTUS until January 20, 2017. I am not claiming that he is in any way "flawless," of course, but the bottom line is that the BETTER person was elected, of the two choices available to the Electorate.