Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Isn't it rich that today Democrats are talking about "the rule of law" after years of lauding Obama ruling by decree?

Obama has refused to enforce immigration law, then last year issued a decree (currently held up in litigation) to abrogate it on his own authority. He has unilaterally made dozens of changes to Obamacare without going to Congress. He has unilaterally repealed Congressionally-mandated work requirements for welfare. He has refused to submit the Iran nuclear capitulation ("deal") to the Senate as a treaty. He has thrown the Constitution into a bonfire, all with the Democrats' backing. He has ruled as a Hugo Chavez-style dictator. And now some hapless clerk nobody ever heard of is a "menace to the rule of law"?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
hunkalove
Obama is a piece of shit. A corporate stooge, just like most politicians. Do not confuse him with a liberal or a Democrat or a decent human being. Dubya did far worse, Obama has been more of the same, as will the next president, no matter what party they belong to,
Bush was far better, not far worse. He acknowledged limits to his power. He went into Iraq only after Congress voted for it.

"Do not confuse him with a liberal or a Democrat"
Hard to ask when the liberals and Democrats have supported him unwaveringly.
hunkalove
Bush had no limits to his power! He was the Old Testament God! He intimidated Congress into
invading Iraq over nonexistent WMDs. He spent trillions of dollars on two wars we could never win, all so war corporations like Halliburton could get even richer. Dubya was the worst president we have had, we will never recover from what he did to us, and Obama has done nothing to change that, and neither will the next president.
AlDemone
Hahahahahahahahahaha. Bush was the biggest piece of shirt the US has ever every seen. Name one thing he ever touched without fucking it up. You're just pissed because you voted for him. Twice.
The CIA told Bush that Saddam had WMDs. The major intelligence agencies of the world agreed. Now tell me the slightest evidence you have that Bush knew the CIA and its sister intelligence agencies were wrong. By the way, one of Saddam's generals wrote a book in which he stated that Saddam shipped the WMDs to Syria before the war. And why do you blame the Afghanistan war on Bush rather than on 9-11, bin Laden, and his Taliban protectors?