Can science guarantee the sunrise tomorrow?

@newjaninev2 is the earth flat?

@Jackaloftheazuresand Please state your argument out front.

What are you trying to say?

@newjaninev2 Oh good I was hoping we could cut through the bs. You default to acknowledging that it doesn't but often in your own practice act as if it does

@Jackaloftheazuresand I have no idea what you're trying to say (or not say).

Please rephrase your comnent so it's a little clearer.

Thanks

@newjaninev2 Your behavior is that of someone who treats it as something that does give guarantees.

@Jackaloftheazuresand I asked:
How do you jump from there to:

Again:
Please state your argument out front.

What are you trying to say?

@newjaninev2 What I stated is why I'm here. I thought we were going to be up front. I think you're a two faced individual who says one thing and does another. I think you don't actually care about science. I think he gets the impression that science is in such a business because of people like you.

@Jackaloftheazuresand
What did you state?

@Jackaloftheazuresand I assume your interest is in epistemology rather than science.

@newjaninev2 This: You default to acknowledging that it doesn't but often in your own practice act as if it does

To which you asked for a clarification and got this: Your behavior is that of someone who treats it as something that does give guarantees.

My interest is in holding you accountable to your actions

@Jackaloftheazuresand I haven't acknowledged anything... in fact, I haven't made any statements other than to ask for clarification.

What behaviour are you talking about?

Please be specific

You keep referring to my 'actions' - what actions?

@newjaninev2 I've watched you. It's time for you to be honest now, I have given enough.

@Jackaloftheazuresand You're still not giving me details.

'watched' me where?

@newjaninev2 You know your history so you don't need me to relay it to you. A person who speaks with such condescension to others on topics pertaining to science and evidence, well that's just not very scientifically grounded now is it.

@Jackaloftheazuresand I would have thought that discussions around the scientific method and the nature of evidence would be very scientifically grounded.

In contrast, vague allusions and non-specific meanderings speak more to confused and unreasoned thinking.

I suspect you lack the courage and the confidence to state your arguments clearly and openly,

That's a shame. Please go ahead and do so... I don't bite

@Jackaloftheazuresand I assume you intend to continue attacking me for no reason and with no reason for your fear.

I further assume that you will continue to avoid details and specifics.

To pass the time while you think up ways to avoid expressing yourself clearly and openly, perhaps you'd like to discuss this season's shoe collection from Jimmy Choo?

@newjaninev2 I've been quite open with you, you were so cordial about it so this is it. You can keep pretending there is some ambiguity here but it really is this simple.

@Jackaloftheazuresand You've certainly been quite open about saying nothing about anything.

ambiguity where?

Come now, be bold and brave. Say what you mean, and say it openly and (above all) honestly.

Jimmy Choo is offering a sandal he calls Azia.
I'm thinking kid leather on a 9.5cm heel.
Probably in black, or perhaps in latte - can't decide.

@newjaninev2 I've said a lot about you

@Jackaloftheazuresand but you haven't said why, and you certainly haven't shown anything to support the somewhat nebulous claims you seem to be making.

You seem to dislike me, and while I don't in the slightest care about, it might be amusing to know why.

Choo does the Azia in a liquid metal finish - but I really don't think that's me

@newjaninev2 because you already know your moral failings and I'm making you aware that I see them too. What I've said thus far is enough to give you the idea that I'm not just bluffing either. If you show me some integrity I might elaborate but that's only if you show the right kind.

@Jackaloftheazuresand Please specify the 'moral failings' you claim to see.

While you're avoiding doing that, you might also avoid specifying what you see as the different 'kinds' of integrity

@newjaninev2 Why would I do that when you're already screwing around. I met your initial questions and it did not lead to reciprocation of dues.

You people always want the answers to the test without realizing(or maybe you do) that even telling you there is something you could do is a generosity I have extended to give you a chance.

@Jackaloftheazuresand So many words to say absolutely nothing 😂