Top | Newest First | Oldest First
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@MalteseFalconPunch If you spent a few seconds on google instead of begging citations from me you would be miles ahead by now. You are just sounding desperate. Kind of sad really. You do know how to google don't you?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
They are tilting at windmills, but there is an agenda that makes them try and exploit fear, and that is globalism. Alarmism is the perfect religion for globalists because the fear-mongering can be used to facilitate all kinds of creepy nasty globalist schemes. Good stewardship of our planet is never a bad idea, but the whole C02 thing is ridiculous. There are many scientists who are brave enough to say so, but most Kowtow to the status quo. Just like all their other lies, they will continue to push it like the loyal little Goebbels disciples that they are.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
@hippyjoe1955 cite what evidence gave rise to your statement
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@yeronlyman Go do your own research and stop asking me for a citation you will never read anyways. You are religious not scientifically minded.
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
@hippyjoe1955 cite “your” research to your public claim
GoldenWorm · 51-55, M
xRedx · M
Yeah, also not all scientists are in consensus that we humans are the main cause of climate change. There are three main views. One being that we humans are actually the main driver of climate change(which all scientists don't agree on). The second being that there's no change occurring and third that change is occurring but it's not human related and cyclic. People are easily brainwashed because they can't research for themselves. So they simply repeat what they hear from news outlets.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
You really are a prize clown.. In fact what you say is absolutely correct.. as two single facts.
The problem is that we have just been through the end of a solar minimum. Which according to your rules means the earth should have been as cool as its doing to get, not warming as it is. While the magnetic field is an erratic variable at best. So, CO2 is a driver. and so are other gases like methane and so is the ice loss itself changing the reflective index of the planet and allowing it to soak in more heat.
The problem is that we have just been through the end of a solar minimum. Which according to your rules means the earth should have been as cool as its doing to get, not warming as it is. While the magnetic field is an erratic variable at best. So, CO2 is a driver. and so are other gases like methane and so is the ice loss itself changing the reflective index of the planet and allowing it to soak in more heat.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@whowasthatmaskedman Except we haven't been through a solar minimum. We had a slight tapering off of solar out put and the temperature has decreased slightly. 1934 being the warmest year on record then 1998. In between times the earth has warmed and cooled and warmed again. Strange how that is. Strange how there is nothing we can do to stop it. I bet the mammoths were some ticked when the climate suddenly cooled and they all died in the ensuing ice age. Did they just not fart enough or what was the deal?
gregloa · 61-69, M
@hippyjoe1955 we didn’t ask for an aus. holes opinion did we. 😂 their always full of gas!
@hippyjoe1955 I have...😊
Don't take me wrong. There's always been opposing views on this theory vs the gravitational one.
Don't take me wrong. There's always been opposing views on this theory vs the gravitational one.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Vivaci The gravity one has been pretty much debunked or else the northern lights would be global lights since gravity is universal. The magnetic poles cause the northern and southern lights. Sorry you missed science class.