This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Fangirlsarah1996 · 26-30, F
The fact that anyone is allowed to post whatever they like.
However, preventing people from doing this would violate a basic human right, freedom of speech.
So, the only rational thing to do is take the good with the bad, lest we look like an authoritarian movement.
However, preventing people from doing this would violate a basic human right, freedom of speech.
So, the only rational thing to do is take the good with the bad, lest we look like an authoritarian movement.
SW-User
@Fangirlsarah1996 Internet access could be done like they choose juries:
Do you have any political affiliation?
Do you believe Hitler was a good person?
How do you feel when I call you an idiot?
And then a panel of people grant or deny access.
Do you have any political affiliation?
Do you believe Hitler was a good person?
How do you feel when I call you an idiot?
And then a panel of people grant or deny access.
Fangirlsarah1996 · 26-30, F
@SW-User No, while I agree that some people aren't fit for the internet, it would be wrong to actively prevent people from being allowed online based on what a group of people say.
SW-User
@Fangirlsarah1996 Fair enough. 😊