If people don’t have an understanding of what science is, and what scientists do
…then they can tend to think that global warming, for example, is just a matter of opinion.
Professor Brian Cox
Professor Brian Cox
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
AuRevoir · 36-40, M
It’s already been disproven to the point that they went from ice age scare tactic, to global warming scare tactic, and now it’s no longer specifically about warming, it’s simultaneously supposed to be about both warming and freezing so now it’s Climate Change.
So as far as current scientists are concerned. Yes, global warming is obsolete.
So it most indefinitely is a matter of opinion.
So as far as current scientists are concerned. Yes, global warming is obsolete.
So it most indefinitely is a matter of opinion.
AuRevoir · 36-40, M
@wildland Lol you’re hilarious. You’re the one that doesn’t understand grammar.
The way you wrote it wrong.
What you implied with the way you structured your sentencing. Is that people who don’t understand science, will believe that it is only a matter of opinion. Not that scientist can articulate global warming as a distinctive separation from science itself and chalk it up to mere opinion.
If you don’t believe me then copy and paste your own post verbatim into Chatgpt or whatever your preferred AI model is and ask it about sentence structure and whether the statement reads as suggesting that other people are misinterpreting the meaning of science. Or if it implies what you do incorrectly believe you had implied.
The way you wrote it wrong.
What you implied with the way you structured your sentencing. Is that people who don’t understand science, will believe that it is only a matter of opinion. Not that scientist can articulate global warming as a distinctive separation from science itself and chalk it up to mere opinion.
If you don’t believe me then copy and paste your own post verbatim into Chatgpt or whatever your preferred AI model is and ask it about sentence structure and whether the statement reads as suggesting that other people are misinterpreting the meaning of science. Or if it implies what you do incorrectly believe you had implied.