If your trip ended where it started, you just wasted energy.
Or more precisly, if your trip is a closed path, you wasted exergy.
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
NerdyPotato · M
If you're just driving in a loop, yes. If you walk or cycle, you get some training out of it. And if you pick something up along the way, whether it's groceries or a better mood, it's not a complete waste either. In fact most trips start and end at home, yet many are more than useful; they are pretty much essential.
Luke73 · 22-25, M
@NerdyPotato That's true. I've never said anything about usefulness though.
JoyfulSilence · 46-50, M
Yes, but the Earth rotated and revolved, the Sun moved, and the galaxy moved, while I did it. Of course motion is all relative.
If I sit still relative to observer A he would say I had no motion and no kinetic energy. If observer B is moving at a constant velocity relative to A and I, then B would say I have kinetic energy.
But in both cases my kinetic energy did not change.
Yet if I fired a rocket to accelerate (in both inertial frames A and B) away from A, decelerate and stop relative to A, then turn around, and accelerate back, then decelerate and stop where I started, I would expend chemical energy relative to both frames even though my kenetic energy never changed.
If I used other energy (chemical, solar radiation, nuclear) to generate power and ran programs to train the next AI model, I may not have wasted energy. Of course that is a matter of perspective (mental).
Round and round we go!
If I sit still relative to observer A he would say I had no motion and no kinetic energy. If observer B is moving at a constant velocity relative to A and I, then B would say I have kinetic energy.
But in both cases my kinetic energy did not change.
Yet if I fired a rocket to accelerate (in both inertial frames A and B) away from A, decelerate and stop relative to A, then turn around, and accelerate back, then decelerate and stop where I started, I would expend chemical energy relative to both frames even though my kenetic energy never changed.
If I used other energy (chemical, solar radiation, nuclear) to generate power and ran programs to train the next AI model, I may not have wasted energy. Of course that is a matter of perspective (mental).
Round and round we go!
View 4 more replies »
AliyaNahid · 26-30, F
@JoyfulSilence I don't think so it has nothing to do with the topic dropped, you are driving things other way around
AliyaNahid · 26-30, F
I waded through all the comments people dropped, on the whole, I would care to throw some of my cents on the table related to it.
You are on the point anyhow. If your work or daily activities or even the things you have been learning whether or not it is your career whatever it is, not lifting you to the next level and you are stuck in the mud with the same pattern is kinda you are barking at the wrong tree. Not only drains your energy but also wastes time, which is why you gotta be cautious about what you doing and how much you gaining a good deal of ground
You are on the point anyhow. If your work or daily activities or even the things you have been learning whether or not it is your career whatever it is, not lifting you to the next level and you are stuck in the mud with the same pattern is kinda you are barking at the wrong tree. Not only drains your energy but also wastes time, which is why you gotta be cautious about what you doing and how much you gaining a good deal of ground
DemiGod22 · 26-30, M
Physically you might end up in the same circumstance but after everything is said and done you should have opened up all of your chalkras and brain waves where you see everything differently