This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
swirlie · 31-35, F
I would say 'no', only because there would be no relevance for matter to be infinitely divisible anywhere in the universe.
If there was, then matter would have already self-divided with infinite results for the purpose of achieving that useful end.
But because none of that happened to matter, it means there is no useful purpose for matter to become infinitely divisible, which is why it isn't.
If there was, then matter would have already self-divided with infinite results for the purpose of achieving that useful end.
But because none of that happened to matter, it means there is no useful purpose for matter to become infinitely divisible, which is why it isn't.


