My 3rd and last post in my series, finishing this demolition of germ theory. Now, (PCR tests) To Fool the People – Is the Test the Key?
Exposing how the PCR test is meaningless when testing for viruses very much appears to be the key to exposing the scam.
If you’ve had more than a few cases of the common cold then you’ve very likely had a coronavirus. The coronavirus family strains are a large family. Everyone has one strain or another in their DNA.
The following is from a medical forum. The writer, who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US, prefers to stay anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. – Julian Rose
“I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.
This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.
The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.
The problem is the test is known not to work.
It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.
Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.
The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense
And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.
If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.
If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.
And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.
Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.
They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.
There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.
All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.
Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.
You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.
Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.
Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.
Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.
But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.
You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen. Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.
They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.”
Here is a link to the original article on Global Research:
Here is a video about this article and the test (So YouTube removed this video, just like they removed Dr Tom Cowan’s one and Tom Barnett’s. They say this video ‘violated their terms of service’ – it did not… anyway I have found a re-upload) YouTube have now deleted the two re-uploads I found of this video. I have now provided a link to it on BitChute. The image is linked – it will open the video in a new tab if you click on it. The url is provide below as well:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/j3Gcl5irxwLJ/
I found another re-upload of the video on YouTube – I will leave the BitChute link here as well, as YouTube will very likely delete this one as well at some point (Update: The YouTube version has gone now. YouTube recently did another major purge / censor (Nov 2021) and they found nearly all the videos they might have missed that questioned the mainstream narrative – and there weren’t that many left – but they found them.)
Here is another article – it agrees that the tests are pointless:
Article: Op-Ed: Does the 2019 Coronavirus Exist? (Looking at the testing for COVID-19)
A small quote from this article: “The coronavirus panic is just that, an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test, that has never been connected to a virus.”
(Some additonal content on PCR tests and Kary Mullis – added November 2020)
“… If they can find this virus in you at all, and the PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody, it starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else. Because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of in your body. So that can be thought of a misuse use of it, to claim that it is meaningful.” – Kary Mullis
“PCR is seperate from that, it is just a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That’s what it is. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.” – Kary Mullis
Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests as Unreliable & Unlawful to Quarantine People (97% false positives):
Here is a link to a short video about the PCR tests, which also discusses the amount of cycles being used and shows Kary Mullis calling out Fauci:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xLgfRJOCmeTl/
Here is a video by the brilliant virologist and microbiologist Dr Stefan Lanka on the PCR tests, which align with what Kary Mullis and many other doctors and scientists have been saying (YouTube deleted the video but I found it on Vimeo. Update: Vimeo took down all videos questioning the mainstream narrative non Vaccines in Oct/Nov 2021.) I found an upload of it on Odysee. This video linked below has some excellent insights and explanations:
YouTube took down huge amounts of Sam Bailey’s videos in Oct/Nov 2021. She has a channel on Odysee where all her videos are uploaded. Here is the link to her PCR test video on there – and to her uncensored channel:
So now you can do some further research for yourself – and you can also observe the world with my last 3 post series of information debunking germ theory in the back of your mind.
