Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Anatta. No soul,no self.

"Anatta', opposite to the Hindu belief of 'Anatman'..(which is belief in a soul,or something permanent).
According to Buddhism nothing is permanent,in fact nothing exists unchanging for even a nanosecond. All is in flux.
And for that reason there is no soul that transmigrates or goes to heaven after death. There isn't even a fixed 'i' or a fixed 'Me' or 'Self'..that travels from one moment to the next during life.
Thoughts exist but there is no thinker of those thoughts.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Not quite...

https://www.learnreligions.com/reincarnation-in-buddhism-449994
What Is the Self?

The Buddha taught that what we think of as our "self"--our ego, self-consciousness, and personality -- is a creation of the skandhas.

Very simply, our bodies, physical and emotional sensations, conceptualizations, ideas and beliefs, and consciousness work together to create the illusion of a permanent, distinctive "me."

The Buddha said, “Oh, Bhikshu, every moment you are born, decay, and die.”

He meant that in every moment, the illusion of "me" renews itself.

Not only is nothing carried over from one life to the next; nothing is carried over from one moment to the next.

This is not to say that "we" do not exist--but that there is no permanent, unchanging "me," but rather that we are redefined in every moment by shifting impermanent conditions
.

Suffering and dissatisfaction occur when we cling to desire for an unchanging and permanent self that is impossible and illusory. And release from that suffering requires no longer clinging to the illusion.

My qualm with Buddhism is this idea that the soul after death doesn't change.

Literally EVERYTHING MUST CHANGE. Including any souls and deities!

Otherwise there's no balance between life and after death.

Change is THE essential commonality between the two.

Without change there is nothing! Void! Like before the Big bang, where not even thought existed. Because thought IS change.

The balance IS CHANGE once again. There's Void and there is the balance CHANGE.

A permanent soul or personality will not survive death or spend anytime with a god or a devil.

The idea of God and the devil is supposed to indicate polarity in everything. Therefore balance is absent in Christianity.

I can't stress how wrong this polarity is. Because balance is absent.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@DeWayfarer Buddhism doesn't teach that there's a soul after death. Your qualm is unfounded. All things are constantly changing. You are correct re the illusion of self though,created by the skandhas.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Entwistle I said not quite. Not that there is a soul yet they do believe in reincarnation. You don't remember that change however.

Take note of the Hindu caste system in reincarnation. That's their dharma at work.

My claim is very founded though, because there is no balance in the Hindu life/death beliefs.

The balance appears only in void/change.

With void being absolute nothing. Not even thought. Which thought is change

Also please take note that don't say what happens at death, nor at birth.

I just don't believe in dharma. It's not fated.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@DeWayfarer I don't really care about the Hindu belief in reincarnation to be honest. Thought creates samsara.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Entwistle argue it with the Hindus and Buddhist since you're given Hindu and Buddhist examples. Buddhism comes from Hinduism. Like Christianity comes from Catholicism.

The two main branches are totally different. So don't compare against Christian/Catholic God and the devil beliefs. They don't believe in balance in ANY way. It's a polar belief. No in between.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@DeWayfarer Buddhism doesn't have its roots in Hinduism. I'm not arguing aim just stating my underlying is all.
Also I can compare whatever I like.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Entwistle you can't deny it all you want. Yet the historical records say otherwise. Same goes for the Christian Bible. It's origins are in Egyptian and Sumerian beliefs. Which neither recognizes.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@DeWayfarer What am i denying?
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Entwistle You said
Buddhism doesn't have its roots in Hinduism.

This is historically false!

The Hindus actually have a class Dharma for Buddhists. No one else in fact. Not even Muslims have a class dharma.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@DeWayfarer I meant to write 'Buddhism does come from Hinduism' ..it has its roots in Hinduism..(that was a misspelling on my phone's part)