This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
So..a friend with benefits? "Platonic lover." No. They need to reciprocate romantic feelings. Though I don't want marriage anyway, I would require that.
SoulConnection · 31-35, M
@SW-User No, friends with benifit and platonic state is DIFFERENT things. Real love doesn't need lust
SW-User
@SoulConnection I think your word choice could've been better.
I'm not saying "real love" needs list. I couldn't understand what you were saying in this post.
Do you mean a relationship with love but no sex?
I'm not saying "real love" needs list. I couldn't understand what you were saying in this post.
Do you mean a relationship with love but no sex?
SoulConnection · 31-35, M
@SW-User well, the word platonic means love without sex and you know this :)
SW-User
@SoulConnection a different kind of love. There is a lack of any sexual attraction.
That is a friend. Not a lover.
That is a friend. Not a lover.
SoulConnection · 31-35, M
@SW-User NOT a friend. Sex DOESN'T make anyone a lover :)
SW-User
@SoulConnection that is a friend. You keep saying no, yet no one here has agreed with you, and those comments have more likes than your OP.
This is wasting time. I'm out
This is wasting time. I'm out
SoulConnection · 31-35, M
@SW-User you can stop here but love CAN be ROMANTIC without SEX.
Take care.
Take care.