Decision Destroying Roe Threatens Legal Right To Interracial Marriage, Experts Warn
These news people sure like their scare tactics. They also said that there might be a ban on birth control
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
softspokenman · M
@DIABLISS We have learned that Justice Thomas' wife Genni had been calling GOP lawmakers telling them to 'back trump harder' etc, she is being subpoenaed. On Thursday the J6 committee exposed some devastating evidence about trump pressuring the DOJ to lie for him. Then on Friday Roe v wade was overturned and Justice Thomas commented that it was "Deeply Flawd". Coincidence?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@softspokenman So the spouse of a SC Justice can't express a political opinion?
softspokenman · M
@hippyjoe1955 Go away Joe.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@softspokenman So you can't answer. Hmmmm
softspokenman · M
@hippyjoe1955 Yes I can, go away joe.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@softspokenman Still no answer. Hmmm. Not very bright or just never thought about your foolish points?
softspokenman · M
@hippyjoe1955 Now your insults, go away Joe.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@softspokenman So you can't answer a simple question..... You truly are a clown
SW-User
@softspokenman your points about Thomas are stronger when they focus on Thomas imho
I would love some links to quotes from him if you have any (genuine) because some of what you say he's said sounds really alarming
I would love some links to quotes from him if you have any (genuine) because some of what you say he's said sounds really alarming
softspokenman · M
@SW-User Which ones are you interested about?
SW-User
@softspokenman wanting to revisit other established rights 😡🔪🔪🔪
softspokenman · M
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@softspokenman And what conclusions did you draw? There is no right to an abortion. Never was. Just a very flawed SCOTUS ruling 50 years out of date.
SW-User
@softspokenman
I found this which is really quite utterly chilling:
CONSERVATIVE JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS, IN A CONCURRING OPINION:
"Because the Court properly applies our substantive due process precedents to reject the fabrication of a constitutional right to abortion, and because this case does not present the opportunity to reject substantive due process entirely, I join the Court's opinion."
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold (which protected the right to contraception), Lawrence (which invalidated state laws banning sodomy), and Obergefell (which legalized gay marriage nationwide)."
"Substantive due process conflicts with that textual command and has harmed our country in many ways. Accordingly, we should eliminate it from our jurisprudence at the earliest opportunity."
I found this which is really quite utterly chilling:
CONSERVATIVE JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS, IN A CONCURRING OPINION:
"Because the Court properly applies our substantive due process precedents to reject the fabrication of a constitutional right to abortion, and because this case does not present the opportunity to reject substantive due process entirely, I join the Court's opinion."
"For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, including Griswold (which protected the right to contraception), Lawrence (which invalidated state laws banning sodomy), and Obergefell (which legalized gay marriage nationwide)."
"Substantive due process conflicts with that textual command and has harmed our country in many ways. Accordingly, we should eliminate it from our jurisprudence at the earliest opportunity."
softspokenman · M
@hippyjoe1955 I don't owe you anything ! I don't need to read your standard insults of "Do your own research and please try to keep up" now go away joe.
softspokenman · M
softspokenman · M