A man should be the primary income holder in a marriage.

A friend of mine said I was wrong but I stand by my statement. What do you'll think?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

I have a totally different position in the matter. A marriage is a partnership, not a sponsorship of one for the other.

And this is specially true if both parties have the ability to work and be productive.

I insisted on paying my share on everything, including trips or vacations.