Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A man should be the primary income holder in a marriage.

A friend of mine said I was wrong but I stand by my statement. What do you'll think?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
I don't agree, I think you should be able to stand on your own if need be as life sometimes doesn't work out but a healthy relationship to me is a partnership. It shouldn't be on just one person. Both people should help each other. That's my two cents.
PDXNative1986 · 36-40, MVIP
@SW-User I think she's a fool who is too enchanted with 1950s nostalgia.
When men end up being the breadwinner we have too much power and control.
Like if I own the deed to a place and this is highly hypothetical not something I'd actually do they could be like hey I'm horny help a brother out and you'd be like "I have a headache and i'm not in the mood" and he could just be all "A mans home is his castle, the fuck am I even letting you live here for if you don't put out?"

Threatening to throw you on the streets. My dad was able to largely abuse his power against his kids with threats of expulsion in the present housing market where everything is unaffordable by default.

and to be clear in this situation since he can prove he owns the deed to the property if you call the police over it they'll just be like it's his house.

totally within his authority.

Suddenly you can't even say no or you'll be homeless.

That's why I believe those who cling to traditional values are self destructive fools.

They don't even realize what they're putting themselves in for.

I like it too when they have their own income because I mean if she can leave me whenever she wants the danger of that happening makes the fact that she doesn't all that much more validating.

Dating women is infinitely better on Hard mode.