A line - crossed? Read to the end
Everybody's looking for something
Who am I to disagree?
Some of them want to use you
Some of them want to get used by you
Some of them want to abuse you
Some of them want to be abused
I recently commented on a post and in reply asked to DM, since some people can be mean and not kind. That was find, but the conversation eventually took a disturbing turn. Let me know what you think.
As we discussed, it came out that he was in a long term female led cuckold marriage where he asked her to think about finding other men to assume his "husbandly" duties. She was very reluctant at first, but she eventually agreed to seek sexual partners. Eventually one of her lovers thought it would be hot for the husband to suck his cock (sounds like classic alpha - beta male). His children were fathered bu other men.
The wife cultivated a very serious culture around thanking the fathers of their children, and her other lovers for their sperm. Embarrassed by being unable to satisfy his wife, he did so as a means of being thankful and respectful. Their sperm became something he worshiped and one of the ways he could receive it was by sucking the man's penis until he had an orgasm in the husbands mouth, or suck it from his wife's vagina. He would be on his knees in front of the lovers like a slave, wearing a bow on the top of his head, and a piece of short lingerie like a teddy, or a short, baby doll nightie sucking their cock with an anal plug, while his wife was kissing them and telling them that she loved them.
Ok, sounds a lot like emotional BDSM, skipping the physical restraints. Well, they are consenting adults.
But, here is the line. He raised his children, now adults with their own children, that women in marriage are not required to be monogamous. That it is a woman's right to impose severe restrictions upon her husband, to discipline him, and even to hurt him physically and emotionally for absolutely no reason at all, other than for her own amusement, or for the thrill of another person, such as a lover.Furthermore that it is a married woman's prerogative to control her husband's penis, his sexuality, his orgasms if any, and it is her absolute right to transfer those rights to another person, such as a male lover of a female friend or lover, or a male or female relative, or to anyone.
This is where we disagreed, and I took exception that they groomed the kids for that lifestyle. He responded that I was very angry, not kind, unaware of anything about human emotions and that obviously I had to be a man because women would not react that way. He felt I unloaded on him, because I did not kindly agree with him like others have, and that well, he felt that I knew what I could do and blocked me. . That's fine, he's more than welcome to block me.
Angry? I could care less about his choice of life style. I was just taken back at how he raised his kids.I personally view marriage as between partners of equal standing - not dominant-submissive. But to have the right to hurt a spouse physically and emotionally for absolutely no reason at all, other than for her/his own amusement, or for the thrill of another person? There are shelters overflowing with abused women, and men. Being married does not give anyone the right to abuse their spouse.
Oddly enough, he unblocked me the next day saying he blocked me and then he unblocked me because he doesn't like blocking people but that I was angry and he didn't want to argue. Well figuring that maybe this was his typical lack of backbone, and being in a female led relationship, I went ahead and blocked him so he wouldn't fell bad.
So, is that a line crossed? What do you think about raising children from a very young to believe that a married spouse have the right to hurt the other spouse physically and emotionally for absolutely no reason at all, other than for her/his own amusement, or for the thrill of another person?
Who am I to disagree?
Some of them want to use you
Some of them want to get used by you
Some of them want to abuse you
Some of them want to be abused
I recently commented on a post and in reply asked to DM, since some people can be mean and not kind. That was find, but the conversation eventually took a disturbing turn. Let me know what you think.
As we discussed, it came out that he was in a long term female led cuckold marriage where he asked her to think about finding other men to assume his "husbandly" duties. She was very reluctant at first, but she eventually agreed to seek sexual partners. Eventually one of her lovers thought it would be hot for the husband to suck his cock (sounds like classic alpha - beta male). His children were fathered bu other men.
The wife cultivated a very serious culture around thanking the fathers of their children, and her other lovers for their sperm. Embarrassed by being unable to satisfy his wife, he did so as a means of being thankful and respectful. Their sperm became something he worshiped and one of the ways he could receive it was by sucking the man's penis until he had an orgasm in the husbands mouth, or suck it from his wife's vagina. He would be on his knees in front of the lovers like a slave, wearing a bow on the top of his head, and a piece of short lingerie like a teddy, or a short, baby doll nightie sucking their cock with an anal plug, while his wife was kissing them and telling them that she loved them.
Ok, sounds a lot like emotional BDSM, skipping the physical restraints. Well, they are consenting adults.
But, here is the line. He raised his children, now adults with their own children, that women in marriage are not required to be monogamous. That it is a woman's right to impose severe restrictions upon her husband, to discipline him, and even to hurt him physically and emotionally for absolutely no reason at all, other than for her own amusement, or for the thrill of another person, such as a lover.Furthermore that it is a married woman's prerogative to control her husband's penis, his sexuality, his orgasms if any, and it is her absolute right to transfer those rights to another person, such as a male lover of a female friend or lover, or a male or female relative, or to anyone.
This is where we disagreed, and I took exception that they groomed the kids for that lifestyle. He responded that I was very angry, not kind, unaware of anything about human emotions and that obviously I had to be a man because women would not react that way. He felt I unloaded on him, because I did not kindly agree with him like others have, and that well, he felt that I knew what I could do and blocked me. . That's fine, he's more than welcome to block me.
Angry? I could care less about his choice of life style. I was just taken back at how he raised his kids.I personally view marriage as between partners of equal standing - not dominant-submissive. But to have the right to hurt a spouse physically and emotionally for absolutely no reason at all, other than for her/his own amusement, or for the thrill of another person? There are shelters overflowing with abused women, and men. Being married does not give anyone the right to abuse their spouse.
Oddly enough, he unblocked me the next day saying he blocked me and then he unblocked me because he doesn't like blocking people but that I was angry and he didn't want to argue. Well figuring that maybe this was his typical lack of backbone, and being in a female led relationship, I went ahead and blocked him so he wouldn't fell bad.
So, is that a line crossed? What do you think about raising children from a very young to believe that a married spouse have the right to hurt the other spouse physically and emotionally for absolutely no reason at all, other than for her/his own amusement, or for the thrill of another person?
