This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultPositive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

The Manipulated Man - a book by Esther Vilar

The Manipulated Man is a 1971 book by author Esther Vilar. The main idea behind the book is that women are not oppressed by men but rather control men to their advantage. A third edition of the book was released in January 2009.

[b]Synopsis[/b]

The book argues that, contrary to common feminist and women's rights rhetoric, women in industrialized cultures are not oppressed, but rather exploit a well-established system of manipulating men.

Vilar writes, "Men have been trained and conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov conditioned his dogs, into becoming their slaves. As compensation for their labours men are given periodic use of a woman's vagina." The book contends that young boys are encouraged to associate their masculinity with their ability to be sexually intimate with a woman, and that a woman can control a man by socially empowering herself to be the gate-keeper to his sense of masculinity.

The author says that social definitions and norms, such as the idea that women are weak, are constructed by women with their needs in mind, and that praise is only given to a man when a woman's needs are met in some way.

Vilar claims that women can control their emotional reactions whereas men cannot, and that women create overly-dramatized emotional reactions to attempt to control men and get their way. She says that women "blackmail" men and use sex as a tool.

The book argues that women use traditions and concepts of love and romance, which are seen more positively than sex, to control men's sexual lives. Vilar writes that men gain nothing from marriage and that women, who are out to get men's money, coerce them into marriage under the pretense that it is romantic.
[b]
Critical reception[/b]

The Manipulated Man was quite popular at the time of its release, in part due to the considerable press coverage it received.

The author Esther Vilar appeared on The Tonight Show on February 21, 1973, to discuss the book. In 1975 she was invited to a televised debate by WDR with Alice Schwarzer, who became known as the representative of the women's movement at that time. The debate was controversial, in particular due to its high aggressiveness, and at some point Schwarzer claimed Vilar was "not only sexist, but fascist", also comparing her book with the Nazi newspaper Der Stürmer.

According to the author, she received death threats over the book: So I hadn't imagined broadly enough the isolation I would find myself in after writing this book. Nor had I envisaged the consequences which it would have for subsequent writing and even for my private life - violent threats have not ceased to this date.

[b]Achievements[/b]

According to research from the Spanish Book Institute, the Spanish translated version was the third-most popular book sold in Spain in 1975.
DrWatson · 70-79, M
A friend of mine, who is unapologetically and unambiguously a feminist, has a very common-sense attitude, I think.

"There are times when men have power over women, and there are times when women have power over men."
Magenta · F
Hmm, interesting and smart. I concur there is defo some truth to this, perhaps not that exaggerated though, and I don't agree that women can control their emotional reactions and men can't. .
Magenta · F
@JimboSaturn Indeed. It isn't one sex against the other, to me. We both have our weakness and strengths.
I agree... the whole "victim mentality" is a huge turn off.
Justice4All · 36-40, M
@JimboSaturn I agree with you that men have traditionally held dominion where it counts. We cannot deny the historical reality of women facing oppression by men. You and I both know that's not up for debate.

From my perspective, the overarching notion is while men have occupied prominent positions of authority, women have exerted substantial influence "behind the scenes." That influence has played a crucial role in shaping societal norms and political structures.

Kings and politicians often sought advice from their wives. Despite men holding the positions of authority, the women held the role of influencing their husbands and sons.

As it relates women's suffrage, it's possible the competitive nature of women played a part in this. Think about this: During the 1800s, women generally didn't aspire to work outside the home. Those who did faced criticism from their peers. However, as time progressed, increasing competitiveness drove more women to join the workforce.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
@Justice4All I don't know if it's just me and my friends and family, but the women seem to run the family and make the decisions.
JimboSaturn · 51-55, M
Perhaps women should have used this control to get equal wages and voting rights earlier.
Jenny1234 · 51-55, F
Hmmm. Interesting and thought provoking. I might have to put this on my to read list

 
Post Comment