Is Kim Jong-un just an Asian Hitler?

The Kim dynasty is nothing short of attrocious, but there are two key differences --

1) The Kim dynasty doesn't annihilate members of its own society just for the crime of existing and having physiological characteristics that they don't like (to my knowledge).
2) The Kim dynasty is rational, whereas Hitler was not.

That's giving Kim Jong-un way too much credit, I mean, what had has Kim Jong-un done other than inherit a business from his father, and kept it going... reportedly struggling going...


I mean Hilter might of done a ton of evil stuff, but to my knowledge, he wasn't just given anything... and he made a hell lot of stuff happen, including getting the entire world out of a great depression (though note, that wasn't his goal nor intention, except for the areas that he controlled, but his creative actions to help his whole country (or really himself) did lead to that).

While Kim Jong-un reportedly continue the great depression in North Korea.



I mean, other than being control freak leaders of a country, whom are/were willing to kill it's own citizens, they seem to be pretty much opposites.

Kim Jong is his own man with his own box of horrible acts. He’s an individual! He is his own God.

No, they're extremely different the only real similarity is being villainous dictators and there's been loads of those.

That's Yeonmi Park.

[b]sounds legit[/b]

No, I think Jong-un's reign will last well into its teens... has it already?

No, but he’s still a bad guy.