I wonder, will I ever meet a Trump supporter who can discuss something logically and rationally and support his or her arguments with credible evidence?
Nah! Not a chance. Clearly, anybody who is rational and logical and can distinguish between credible evidence and “alternative facts”, wouldn’t be a Trump supporter in the first place. I mean seriously, let’s have a look at the little assembly we have here.
In no particular order, we have:
TexChik who thinks that it’s a good thing that her president has massive blue balls.
Then we have hippyjoe1955, a grown man who still can’t distinguish his left from his right, who tells us that “To be blunt the judge in this case (to borrow Obama's words) acted stupidly.”
Obama’s words? Really? I’ve hunted high and low for any comment by Obama on Judge Robarts or Trump’s illegal travel ban (yep, it is illegal, your courts confirmed that yesterday). If I may digress a little bit here because this was priceless.
When your pocket dictator found out that his ILLEGAL executive order had been overturned, he tweeted:
"SEE YOU IN COURT," adding that "THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!"
To which Washington Gov. Jay Inslee replied:
"Mr. President, we just saw you in court, and we beat you."
As I said, priceless.
Now back to this assertion that President Obama said that Judge Robarts had acted stupidly, I’VE FOUND NOTHING! NOTHING AT ALL. What I did find was this:
Then there’s Jason947 who insists that the murder of 3,000 innocent American citizens was an inside job and that Trump had created 227,000 jobs, IN JANUARY. The idiot had only been in office for 11 days and had managed to “create” a quarter of a million jobs?
In comes katielass, flying to poor Jason947’s rescue. She tells us that Trump “saved” all those jobs. Sadly katielass, both Time and The Washington Post don’t agree.
Now, I know that Trump and his Trumpettes don’t like journalists, what did he call them (at his address to the CIA, who he had previously likened to Nazis), oh yes, I remember. He called them:
“the most dishonest human beings on Earth.”
But, this is Time and The Washington Post, two of the most prestigious and highly regarding news disseminators in America. Actually, in the world!
Time and The Washington Post! Two of the main players in the downfall of that other con artist who occupied The White House, tricky dickey, Richard Nixon.
But, katielass, your crowning glory has to be the mindless nonsense that you’ve posted about refugees and who can and can’t be vetted. So, “FBI and Intelligence officials testified under oath in front of congress about how these refugees cannot be vetted.”?
No shit Sherlock. Tell me, were those FBI and Intelligence officers waterboarded before they made such a monumental announcement? Under oath! To Congress!
Let’s rewind a bit.
katielass – “Why would the president ban people from Saudi Arabia when those people can be vetted.” Moi – “people from any country can be vetted” katielass – “refugees cannot be vetted”
How many refugees have there been, beating down the doors of the good ol’ US of A, from Saudi Arabia? Actually, let’s widen our scope a bit. How many refugees, from Saudi Arabia, have turned up anywhere seeking asylum?
My guess is going to be a big fat ZERO!
But, the real joy in all of this "immigration ban" fiasco, the point that neither you Trumpettes nor your idiot leader seem to get, is that, the people affected by the ban are people who already have visa’s and green cards ie PEOPLE WHO HAVE ALREADY BEEN VETTED!
You're right about the jobs thing. I was too eager and excited about Trumps election to really look into it. As for journalists , the job of the press is to inform not spread liberal propaganda and brainwash the public with lies and that is what they have been doing. That is what they are doing. Thankfully Nickelodeon is beating cnn in the daytime ratings and nickelodeon is fucking dead too!
As for 9/11 I invite you to look into it yourself. You may be incredibly suprised.
@room101: it's amazing how narcissistic you tards can be ... all you're pathetic whining and rants still don't change anything ... Trump is still the President. Hahahaha
Let me ask you this, Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda openly stated their hatred for America many, many times. They've called America and Americans everything from imperialists to liars to devils to God knows what else. Now, considering this rabid hatred, why have they never denied their role in 911? Why did they not go to Al Jazeera (which is a Muslim news provider) and deny their part in 911? Why did they not provide any proof that they were never involved?
Just think about it. They could have made America look like the most depraved nation on the planet. They didn't do any of that did they. In fact, they did the exact opposite and took complete ownership of this most heinous of terrorist acts. Why?
@room101: sorry tard , his photo comes up when I typed in President ... but when I typed in loud mouthed pathetic libtard ... POOF! There you were. And guess what tard? All your pathetic whining isn't going to change the election . Sorry
@room101: First of all, Bin Laden's initial reaction to 9/11 was not to take credit for the crime at all. In fact, he continually denied any involvement in 9/11 up until the 'confession' video was mysteriously presented. Almost no one in the U.S. has read Bin Laden's first statement in response to 9/11, which so conflicts the later 'confession'. Here it is, from September 17, 2001:
"I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons. I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders' rules. The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations."
@Jason947: and then he admitted it and reveled in that admission. Just think about it, he could have brought America to its knees. He would have made America the most hated nation in the world. The British would have turned their back on America. The EU would have turned its back on America. Christ, NATO would have been disbanded! He would have won.
But no, he carried on with his "fake admission" instead. Jason, seriously mate, this just too silly for words. Please, take it somewhere else. I'm not interested.
Why would a man spend six weeks denying a crime, then suddenly flip-flop 180 degrees and happily start taking responsibility for the originally denied crime? Makes no sense.
@Jason947: No mate, what makes no sense is that America would kill 3,000 of its own people, and destroy one of its most iconic landmarks, just to go to war in Afghanistan where yet more Americans would certainly die.
Now, if any of that happened under a Trump administration, I would probably believe you
@room101: You really think the politicians give a shit about the common man? We are the ones fighting the wars and dying and they are the ones who benefit from it. We are nothing but collateral to people like Bush and Obama. We are even less than nothing to the elites who orchestrated this entire thing.
Capturing Osama Bin Laden was never the actual reason the U.S. and Britain invaded Afghanistan. Gaining strategic and territorial access to the huge reserves of natural gas and energy in the Central Asian countries of Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, etc., then linking a pipeline from those reserves through business friendly Pakistan to the Indian sub-continent, and through the twisted arm of Iran and annexed Iraq to connect with the Persian Gulf to the west in order to prop up certain allies of multi-national corporations competing on the 'free' and 'open' market - that was the point of the invasion of Afghanistan, and later Iraq.
And by any reasonable definition or interpretation of international law, these are not viable excuses to justify war. They are crimes against humanity, and wars of aggression. The very same laws officially violated by Nazi war criminals.
