This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultUpdate
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

PSA: On new US currency, do not, repeat do not write or stamp "IS A PEDOPHILE" under tRump's signature!

!!! PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT !!!

When you encounter US paper currency with tRump's signature, do not, repeat do not write or stamp "IS A PEDOPHILE" under tRump's signature!

It is a crime to write on US paper currency, so therefore please do not write or stamp "IS A PEDOPHILE" under tRump's signature!!



This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Not even with "Approved by convicted rapist" or "In rapists we trust"?🙃
JohnnySpot · 56-60, M
@DeWayfarer Trump was never convicted of rape, saying that is what got Stephanopolis in trouble.
@JohnnySpot tRump was convicted of sexual assault of a form that in many jurisdictions is classified as r@pe. Read how the judge dismissed tRump's claim that use of the word r@pe was defamation.

Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is ‘substantially true’ in court dismissal

... Dismissing the counterclaim, Judge Kaplan provided an unsparing analysis of the legal issues that informed the New York verdict. He wrote: “The only issue on which the jury did not find in Ms Carroll’s favour was whether she proved that Mr Trump ‘raped’ her within the narrow, technical meaning of that term in the New York penal law.

... “It could not find that he ‘raped’ her if it determined that Mr Trump forcibly penetrated Ms Carroll’s private sexual parts with his fingers – which commonly is considered ‘rape’ in other contexts – because the New York penal law definition of rape is limited to penile penetration.”

Kaplan had already outlined why it was not defamation for Carroll to say Trump raped her.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/07/donald-trump-rape-language-e-jean-carroll
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@JohnnySpot @ElwoodBlues

And the actual statement by judge Kaplan which I commented with before.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790/gov.uscourts.nysd.543790.200.0.pdf