This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Subscription. 🫤
Not worth even figuring a way around it either. Never heard of the site. Silly of a unknown site to have a subscription. Not like it's the WSJ or the NYT.
Not worth even figuring a way around it either. Never heard of the site. Silly of a unknown site to have a subscription. Not like it's the WSJ or the NYT.
butterflybaby75 · 41-45, F
@DeWayfarer Sorry I didn't realise. I use script, etc. blockers in my firefox installation so I don't get ads or slammed with the paywall.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@butterflybaby75 oh I could likely figure a way around it. I have for the two I mentioned.
dumasme · 51-55, M
@DeWayfarer WSJ or the NYT fall into left leaning outlets... not going to get the truth from them either.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@dumasme Funny that even Trump subscribes to both the WSJ and the NYT.
I do believe Trump himself is making a point, with even having those subscriptions.
I do believe they both are capitalistic rags though, because of the attempt to force the same subscriptions.
Republicans don't have exclusive rights to capitalism BTW.
Capitalism is still just morally wrong. No matter who, or how many, adheres to the principles.
It's a case in point of the Republican saying: "the majority is never right".
I do believe Trump himself is making a point, with even having those subscriptions.
I do believe they both are capitalistic rags though, because of the attempt to force the same subscriptions.
Republicans don't have exclusive rights to capitalism BTW.
Capitalism is still just morally wrong. No matter who, or how many, adheres to the principles.
It's a case in point of the Republican saying: "the majority is never right".
jackjjackson · M
It’s called opposition research. Smart. @DeWayfarer
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@jackjjackson sorry wrong post and different jack*.🫤
jackjjackson · M





