Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Think That Donald Trump Is Dangerous For This Country

I knew that Trump was dangerous, but now he clearly thinks he is a dictator... Note this article. He ordered the Interior Department, which as one of its official duties to keep records of events and crowds in our public parks, to cease operating its Twitter accounts for a comparison with Obama he did not like.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2017/01/21/interior-department-banned-from-twitter-after-retweet-smaller-than-usual-trump-inauguration-crowd/2S7MgjBwftXVN6qfd8GnQP/story.html
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Goralski · 51-55, M
I didn't here you talking about Obama being dangerous when he started three wars without congressional approval
He didn't start three wars... He continued GW Bush's two wars and got involved in Syria because of demands from Congressmen of both parties, but primarly Republicans.... The reason Trump is dangerous is because he does not respect the Constitution and seems to want to ignore our rules re immigration...but mostly because he is trying to stifle any criticism of him and his policies, his bad behavior, his advocacy of grabbing women's genitals, his bigotry, his choice of cabinet members who intend to destroy government programs that protect our water and our air, our health, etc.... Here the issue is shutting down a government department for reporting info that he did not like...the evidence is clear... it is not fake news... the photos show the difference in the crowds.... Get the message Goralski it is being shown in protests around the world today, and twice as many women marching against him in DC alone than showed up for his Inauguration yesterday. He lost to Mrs. Clinton by 3 million votes, but through a quirk of our election system assisted by our enemy Russia, he ended up winning the electoral process.
Goralski · 51-55, M
@Humanist321: and Obama respects d constitution by expanding d surveillance state against the citizens. ..and its Syria. .Libya. ..Yemen plus various other north African countries plus the overthrow of Ukraine yeah he had no hand its always d other guy
adhane05 · 31-35, M
@Humanist321: Obama admitted in his last conference there was no evidence of Russian hacking. It's just all a big lie Obama started and he certainly wasn't concerned with cyber security until after the election.
@adhane05: [b]That[/b] is the lie. You should stop relying on Breitbart.com and Fox for your news. 🙄
adhane05 · 31-35, M
@bijouxbroussard: No, it came out of Obama's mouth.
@adhane05: link ? Trump supporters don't listen to anything that comes directly from Trump's mouth (or fingers via Tweet) always claiming he was "taken out of context". And [b]Trump[/b] admitted to the hackers. But any lie about Obama, you'll accept without question. Typical.
adhane05 · 31-35, M
@bijouxbroussard: It's not all about what Obama says or Donald says. The ODMI report itself does not have any actual evidence to back up the hacking conspiracy. There is also John McAfee, the founder of McAfee Antivirus said “if it looks like the Russians did it, then I can guarantee you it was not the Russians." And I'll add one more thing, you are innocent until proven guilty. It's completely irresponsible to punish someone before knowing they're are guilty because they could be innocent.
@adhane05: That's a longstanding American tradition. We judge, condemn and even execute people without trying them. There's never an exhortation to not "rush to judgement" when the accused is [b]not[/b] a conservative.
@adhane05: The joint statement by all 17 of our intelligence agencies agreed that it was the Russians who did it. The person from a commercial antispam software company does not have access to the evidence. Those who SAW the evidence agree that it is conclusive. The public report (as the Russians said) does not contain the evidence because that would put the spies in Russia and the specific ways that they determined their conclusions at risk. Your comment is just plain uninformed about the issues.
adhane05 · 31-35, M
@Humanist321: Has there been any evidence released for us to see? Or is that top secret? I think there might be some more details being released sometime in 90 days, now that I think about it.