Think about MAGAs

1. CONVICTED FELONS don’t get security clearances

2. FELONS who steal classified information don’t get security clearances

3. Intelligent people don’t vote for TRAITORS, CONVICTS, or ADJUDICATED RAPISTS.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

MistyCee

That last one might need some unpacking:

3. Intelligent people don’t vote for TRAITORS, CONVICTS, or ADJUDICATED RAPISTS.

Why shouldn't intelligent people vote for these folks?

US National Security may not be their priority, or they might expect pecuniary gain from information being traded, for example.

To be clear, I'm not entirely disagreeing with the point, but I don't think it's quite right. Intelligent people can still be short sighted, and they may have other priorities besides the national interest. They might even have an exit plan and an offshore account set up for when the nation collapses.

KunsanVeteran · M

@MistyCee Would you agree with “moral” rather than “intelligent?”

KunsanVeteran · M

@MistyCee I will concede that voting for tRump is not yet a universally recognized criteria for lacking intelligence.

However, we are much closer to recognizing it today than we were in 2015/16!

MistyCee

@KunsanVeteran Its probably still a little simplistic, but I certainly think that voting for Trump is really hard to justify on moral grounds.

Abortion could I guess be arguable, and there's always the international globalist child molestation thing they Trump is fighting against, so, maybe, "intelligent and moral"?

bijouxbroussard · F

@MistyCee So someone civilly found guilty of sexual assault himself gets a pass because he claims to have fought against an international group of "groomers” that no one else knows about ? 🤔

MistyCee

@bijouxbroussard That sounds like mostly an intelligence failure to me. Remember they can probably pin the rape judgment on the conspiracy as well.

KunsanVeteran · M

@bijouxbroussard Why do I get the feeling that tRump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Maxwell were all on the same side of the “groomers” thing…

bijouxbroussard · F

@KunsanVeteran Because, based on the evidence, they were. And it seems like as much the GOP rants about "groomers", anyone involved who’s Republican or Republican-affiliated gets a pass.

KunsanVeteran · M

@bijouxbroussard You certainly got that right! And don’t forget Gaetz, Santos, Jordan, and Boeberts issues with “grooming.”

Very different than Sloppy Steve’s issues…