This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
calicuz · 51-55, M
I think it's doubtful. That will send a message to future Presidents that they can break the law and have no regard for the Constitution.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@calicuz And while that is already the case, it isnt officially enshrined in law...yet..😷
calicuz · 51-55, M
@whowasthatmaskedman
"Technically," Presidents "manipulate," the Constitution, which in my opinion is the same as trampling on the Constitution, but under "the law" it is just translating it differently.
"Technically," Presidents "manipulate," the Constitution, which in my opinion is the same as trampling on the Constitution, but under "the law" it is just translating it differently.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@calicuz I prefer the word, "interpret" Thats how the bible gets misused..😷
calicuz · 51-55, M
@whowasthatmaskedman
That's why I call it "doctrine" and not "scripture," there is a distinct difference.
That's why I call it "doctrine" and not "scripture," there is a distinct difference.