This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ididntknow · 51-55, M
5 million dollars for anyone that can discredit the proof, says Mike lindell
@ididntknow Lol. How do you discredit something that doesnt exist?
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@MistyCee in your world it doesn’t, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t, you are indoctrinated to think it doesn’t, by the shit you watch and listen to
@ididntknow Yes, we live in different worlds and coincidentally, have entirely different views on what is indoctrination.
Nevertheless, let's see what magic beans he shows in August at his cybersymposium.
Nevertheless, let's see what magic beans he shows in August at his cybersymposium.
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@MistyCee it’s not a case of different opinions, you’ll never believe there was fraud, even if it was laid out in front of you,
@ididntknow I haven't seen it laid out yet.
My "opinion" is that I'm extremely skeptical that anything persuasive to me will be in terms of significant fraud that would have changed the outcome.
I could detail the reasons for my skepticism, but tbh, reading a few pleadings and the transcript of a sanctions hearing would really be enough, even without more.
What's your "opinion", or if you prefer, belief?
My "opinion" is that I'm extremely skeptical that anything persuasive to me will be in terms of significant fraud that would have changed the outcome.
I could detail the reasons for my skepticism, but tbh, reading a few pleadings and the transcript of a sanctions hearing would really be enough, even without more.
What's your "opinion", or if you prefer, belief?
Budwick · 70-79, M
@ididntknow [quote] you’ll never believe there was fraud, even if it was laid out in front of you,[/quote]
For what it's worth - I think you nailed it.
For what it's worth - I think you nailed it.
@ididntknow The problem is the burden of proof is on the ones making the accusations, which is Lindell.
And again, why hasn't he taken this to court if it's so full proof?
And again, why hasn't he taken this to court if it's so full proof?
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@TRUMPisGOD Time will tell
@ididntknow Until they convince a judge of something, time has already told...
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@TRUMPisGOD No it hasn’t
@ididntknow Yes it has, they have found evidence of other election issues a lot quicker... which they have failed to find anything so far, or at least failed to bring it in front a federal judge.
Look at all the other election scandals, they found evidence within a month...
Either this is the most coordinated and well-organized cover up ever... Or it didn't happen.
And if you look at Democrats policies and how they run things, they CLEARLY aren't the most organized types.
Look at all the other election scandals, they found evidence within a month...
Either this is the most coordinated and well-organized cover up ever... Or it didn't happen.
And if you look at Democrats policies and how they run things, they CLEARLY aren't the most organized types.
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@TRUMPisGOD Evidence is coming out, but being suppressed, have you read the time magazine article, hundreds of conservative you tube channels have been taken down, mainstream media are in democrats pockets, as well as big tech,
@ididntknow YouTube ain't evidence, and if you got some you need to take it to either Conservative or Court.
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@TRUMPisGOD what about Karen Fann