Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Hardly A Flattering Photo! Whatever Your Views On The Bloke

I cannot reproduce the image here, and it's likely copyright anyway, but I'll try to describe it as others might recognise it.

The Press Association round-up in my local paper yesterday carried a brief item about Mark Rutte, head of NATO, meeting President Trump in Washington. It was illustrated by a PA photographer, Jacquelyn Martyn. The text was actually about Mr. Rutte's appeal to other European nations to up their defence budgets, not his meeting with Trump.


The two men are perched in arm-chairs side-by-side in front of an ornate fireplace.

Mr. Rutte, on the left, has turned partially to his left, his left elbow resting on the chair arm, fingers spread pensively on his face, which faces the camera but remains rather inscrutable. His right arm is extended, hand open, towards Mr. Trump as if about to shake hands.

Only...

President Trump is sitting facing us, knees apart, hands between them, stretched fingers lightly together. Hunched slightly forwards, he seems not notice his guest, in fact his eyes are closed, his face expressionless. Was he asleep? He looks it.


It is a very odd scene and a bit unkind of the PA to have released that image; but of course we cannot know the time pressure put on the Press by the acolytes / hangers-on.


It did make me imagine a Caption Competition, so if anyone else has seen and recognises the photograph, here are mine:

President Trump (not asleep but thinks) "I really shouldn't have imposed those bigly import tariffs on algaecide."

From the way he holds his arm out - Mark Rutte (sotto voce): It's all right, Mr. Vance. If he falls forwards I'll catch him".
Top | New | Old
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Indeed.

I took the Mickey out of it there but there is a more serious point:

The PA, in fact the photographer, should have been more careful because it could rebound on them much more than on the the politician and the civil-servant.

Ironically the picture seemed more intended as a library shot than anything because the article was not about Rutter meeting Trump.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
@ArishMell Perhaps a word of explanation about how photos get into the press. When the cameras go off you hear multiple clicks as each photographer shoots off a series of takes. They shoot as much as they can including blinks of an eye, a momentary grimace or smile or even transitioning expression. This is all sent back to HQ which will select one from the many submitted for publication. The choice is nothing to do with the photographer - it is purely editorial and that has an agenda. A helpful photo is gold even it is not in context.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@FreddieUK

Finding an awkward-looking frame is particularly easy if you have a video.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@FreddieUK Thankyou for the explanation. It is certainly an odd photo - but what we can't know is who chose it, the AP or the local newspaper's editor.

It is tempting to ponder the fact that like many local newspapers in Britain it is owned by Newsquest, which was taken over some years ago by some American outfit appropriately named "Gannet" - but it's hardly credible that the Gannet's nest in the USA would really select which images to use in a foreign newspaper. Even though for a while under its ownership the quality of the publication dived like a sea-bird after a sprat for some while. It has improved markedly since, to be fair.
FreddieUK · 70-79, M
Haven't seen it, but as you say, it seem destined for mockery,

 
Post Comment