Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Can anyone tell me what they like about Kamala

Without mentioning Trump?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I like that VP Harris

• appears to be able to be in public service for years without succumbing to the temptation to illegally make money via bribes / other influence peddling;

• has not been found to have cheated on any taxes or directed others to cheat on taxes;

• has not kept two sets of books to understate property values to taxing authorities and overstate values to lenders;

• has been able to be around many people without grabbing either men or women by the genitalia;

• is not accused of having been at parties thrown by Epstein, or being a close associate of him or his accomplice Ms. Maxwell);

• has not openly invited--and received--assistance in any election from a foreign power;

• has not illegally taken sensitive materials of the United States;

• has not disobeyed a direct, legal request fir the return of sensitive materials of the United States or other materials under the purview of the National Archives or any security part of any department, agency, office, etc., of the Federal government;

• has not mishandled or mis-stored sensitive materials by having them openly available to whomever;

• has not impermissibly allowed others without clearance to have access to any sensitive materials of the United States, including viewing, copying, buying such materials;

• has not attempted to impermissibly destroy documents by various means, including tearing them up and trying to flush them;

• has not clogged our WH toilets with such impermissible attempts to destroy documents;

• has not been proved to be a continual, inveterate, and compulsive liar about even mundane things;

• has not been shown to lie even about matters where she admits to the truth;

• has not caused the economy to tank via mishandling of response to a major global medical emergency;

• has not botched a disaster response by suggesting crazy, unscientific "alternative" "cures" which are dangerously stupid;

• has not refused to openly, repeatedly, and publicly urge, implore, ask supporters to use proven life-saving means to keep themselves and others safe (while obtaining the same life-saving means in private and away from cameras);

• has not led to the needless death of hundreds of thousands of her fellow Americans, even possibly a million;

• has not been shown to have lied about the most central facts of her CV;

• has not comported herself in such a way as to have created mass exodus from the US civil service by people resigning in protest;

• has not comported herself in such a way as to have our friends and allies ridicule the US and expose it as a laughingstock;

• has not comported herself in such a way as to call the President's authority, etc., into question such that some other leader of another world power is being called "the leader of the free world";

• has been the most active President of the Senate ever, casting the most tie-breaking votes (33);

• has, as a prosector, been on the right side of the law;

• has never been impeached for any high crimes or misdemeanors;

• has never cozied up to enemy / competitor foreign powers, esp. autocrats / tyrants;

• has never given enemy / competitor foreign powers reason to doubt the resolve of the US to support the international systems which have helped keep the world more stable in the post-WWII era;

• has not made statements or acted in a way as to embolden the enemy or competitor foreign powers to try to threaten, invade, etc., our allies and friends around the world;

• has not acted in any other ways to derail traditional US relationships, values, etc., and thus encourage / sow & nuture the seeds for discord, unrest, conflict, war;

• has not attempted to suborn perjury and fraud, including election fraud, in order to retain power;

• has not encouraged the rise of violent fringe groups;

• has not sought to normalize casual use of slurs, invective, etc., in our political life;

• has not called for violence in her name / on her behalf for political gains / ends;

• has not normalized extreme, crazy, fringe elements or approved their violent, hateful rhetoric;

• has not violated the elements of the Presidential oath of office; ESP. has not attempted to destroy the Constitution by encouraging violence in her name in order to illegally retain power;

• has not substituted her judgment for a jury's, by pardoning / promising to pardon offenders convicted for violence in an attempted coup / insurrection;

• has not pardoned a variety of others convicted by juries and judges of serious crimes against the United States;

• has not paid hush money to silence porn stars or others;

• has not been accused of having extramarital affairs with, e.g., porn stars;

• has not promised to be a dictator;

• had not promised that we will never need to vote again;

• doesn't have numerous ties to Project2025, an explicit plan to take over the government and the country akin to the coup in Hungary;

• has not pretended to be religious in order to gain votes;

• has not been indicted on many counts of serious Federal and State crimes;

• has not been convicted of 34 business crimes in NY State or her home state or ANY state;

• has not been barred from doing business in NY State, her home state, or ANY state, for a period of time;

• has not advocated for pardoning / promised to pardon police killers in an attempted coup;

• has not advocated for pardoning / promised to pardon other violent offenders in an attempted coup;

• has not been judged by people "in the room" as being unwilling to read, unable to concentrate, unable to handle details;

That's a start...
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@Northwest True, but it's hard to refute my list. 😊
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy Not true. Northwest doesn’t know what a strawman is, nor do either of you get to decide whether or not I was looking for an actual answer. You’ve both failed to answer it, though.
@Askeladd No, I answered your question as asked.
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
@SomeMichGuy

Gee, SomeMichGuy, you should have told us these marvelous things about Kamala during the 2020 primaries.

Then she would have won the nomination easily, and Democrats could have voted FOR someone
in the general election, instead of simply voting against Trump. 😂😂😂
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy Nope. You alluded to trump.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@Thinkerbell She now has had Executive experience which she didn't have before being VP.

It is a major boost to her CV, as well as giving her experience being tempted by power, etc.
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@Northwest
Northwest · M
@SomeMichGuy You know that their strategy is racism, sexism and misogyny. Also avoidance and strawman propositions.
@Askeladd

Here was your given task

Can anyone tell me what they like about Kamala

Without mentioning Trump?

So

1) Where did I use the name you told me not to use? I NEVER "mentioned" DJT.

2) If you think that all of those are allusions to DJT, that necessarily means that you AGREE that he HAS done ALL those things.

Therefore, no true patriot, believing this, can support such man.


Glad you have found discernment in politics!
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@Northwest I’ve already told you what a strawman is. You’ve already googled it and have seen that you are wrong.
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy So

I’m going to need you to unplug your brain from the lefty hive mind and think for yourself.

The use of semantics will be ignored. Those are allusions to Trump. This question isn’t an endorsement. I just wanted to see if you all had legitimate reasons to support her or if you’re all just “blue no matter who”.

I’ve got my answer.
@Askeladd You banned mentions of DJT, which I faithfully fulfilled.

More faithfully, in fact, than he fulfilled his own oath of office as the PotUS.

Now you are using a false argument:

people either support her on her own merits or they must be--what was your phrase?--"blue no matter who", as though those fill out all possible regions of the Venn diagram.

They do not.

And now I have further proof that you're neither serious nor a patriot.
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy Again. The use of semantics will be ignored. You have failed to answer the question.
@Askeladd I drew no drawing, so I have no idea what substances you are on (or which required meds you are off).

If you don't understand the notion of your list not being exhaustive, that's on you.
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy Oh snap. Autocorrect. Everything I’ve ever said is derailed. 🙄

I will give you one more chance until you get the Northwest treatment.
@Askeladd I am not giving you any more chances.

You understood the allusions, but still support a person who did all those things.

So you are indeed neither serious nor a true patriot...of the United States. Good luck, comrade.
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy
@Askeladd I know you can't argue outside of your script.

Better luck next time.

Being called that by you means nothing! lmao
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy You haven’t offered anything to refute. You’ve only shown that you can’t answer my question.
@Askeladd You just proved again that you can't read! lmao

Entertaining you are!
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy I wish you were.
@Askeladd Never fun to be shown up, comrade! Well, put it in your report and see what your superiors in Moscow or Beijing do.

If you get to the West, many libraries have adult literacy resources, if you are a person and an adult.
Askeladd · 31-35, M
@SomeMichGuy It’s sad that you have to hype yourself up, when you’ve failed such a simple task. Based on that behavior, I’m inclined to believe that you may be Northwest on another account. At the very least, you share a brain cell, and it seems to be currently out of order.