What is a controversial question or stance you have?
Or, you can comment and I'll ask something crafted to tickle your not so funny bone 🙃
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
AuRevoir · 36-40, M
The fact that everything right now going on politically in western nations, is garnered towards attempting to sway society to accept pedophilia, by ushering it in through the school systems.
Such as the erotic novels being issued to children that feature pornographic erotica concerning 10 year olds in the story.
[media=https://youtu.be/vBI_TVSnl4U]
And teachers sexually grooming children to record their sex acts with while trying to raise a defense around under their agenda that children should be taught sexuality early in life.
[media=https://youtu.be/2fvQxE7PzhI]
The fact that these huge things have happened and yet are talked the least about while the news is filled with stupid things is just abhorrent to me...
Such as the erotic novels being issued to children that feature pornographic erotica concerning 10 year olds in the story.
[media=https://youtu.be/vBI_TVSnl4U]
And teachers sexually grooming children to record their sex acts with while trying to raise a defense around under their agenda that children should be taught sexuality early in life.
[media=https://youtu.be/2fvQxE7PzhI]
The fact that these huge things have happened and yet are talked the least about while the news is filled with stupid things is just abhorrent to me...
Gloomy · F
@AuRevoir
This is basically the Red Scare or Satanic Panic of the 21th century.
[quote] For the unfamiliar, “grooming” is a term typically reserved to describe the type of behavior that child sexual abusers use to coerce potential victims without being caught. But now some Republicans are using it against any Democrat (or company) who disagrees with them on certain policy issues. This is a deliberate tactic that was promoted as early as last summer by Christopher Rufo, the same conservative activist who helped muddle the language around critical race theory. “Grooming” is a term that neatly draws together both modern conspiracy theories and old homophobic stereotypes, while comfortably shielding itself under the guise of protecting children. Who, after all, can argue against the safety of kids? But by adopting this language to bolster their latest political pursuits, the right is both giving a nod to fringe conspiracy theorists and using an age-old tactic to dismantle LGBTQ rights. [/quote]
This is basically the Red Scare or Satanic Panic of the 21th century.
[quote] For the unfamiliar, “grooming” is a term typically reserved to describe the type of behavior that child sexual abusers use to coerce potential victims without being caught. But now some Republicans are using it against any Democrat (or company) who disagrees with them on certain policy issues. This is a deliberate tactic that was promoted as early as last summer by Christopher Rufo, the same conservative activist who helped muddle the language around critical race theory. “Grooming” is a term that neatly draws together both modern conspiracy theories and old homophobic stereotypes, while comfortably shielding itself under the guise of protecting children. Who, after all, can argue against the safety of kids? But by adopting this language to bolster their latest political pursuits, the right is both giving a nod to fringe conspiracy theorists and using an age-old tactic to dismantle LGBTQ rights. [/quote]
Gloomy · F
@AuRevoir and some info on the Lawn Boy book which granted is no kids book but was mixed up with an actual kids book with the same name. Also it does not depict pedophilia.
[quote] Lawn Boy,” and the people who targeted it, also illustrate how misinformation germinates. Days after Burkman’s speech, a Virginia mother inspired by her comments falsely asserted during a school board meeting that “Lawn Boy” depicts a sexual encounter between an adult man and a 10-year-old. Her claim, caught on video, was repeated on social media and in news reports and magnified by prominent politicians, spawning pedophilia claims in nearly a dozen school districts, The Post found.
The saga of “Lawn Boy” further shows how concerns about public education spread, fueled by conservative media coverage, political speeches, and advocacy from religious and parents rights groups. In response, mothers and fathers across the country scoured their school library catalogues, signed up for public comment at school board meetings and filed challenges against books.
And what happened to “Lawn Boy” reveals the little room left for nuance or forgiveness in the American political debate. Evison, the author, never meant for his book to be placed in school libraries, he told The Post in an interview. He was surprised when the American Library Association gave “Lawn Boy” an award in 2019 for its appeal to teens. Evison believes that some librarians who chose the novel did so because of the award — and he says that, if any recommended it to lower- or middle-schoolers, they probably confused it with the children’s book “Lawn Boy,” by Gary Paulsen. [/quote]
[quote] Lawn Boy,” and the people who targeted it, also illustrate how misinformation germinates. Days after Burkman’s speech, a Virginia mother inspired by her comments falsely asserted during a school board meeting that “Lawn Boy” depicts a sexual encounter between an adult man and a 10-year-old. Her claim, caught on video, was repeated on social media and in news reports and magnified by prominent politicians, spawning pedophilia claims in nearly a dozen school districts, The Post found.
The saga of “Lawn Boy” further shows how concerns about public education spread, fueled by conservative media coverage, political speeches, and advocacy from religious and parents rights groups. In response, mothers and fathers across the country scoured their school library catalogues, signed up for public comment at school board meetings and filed challenges against books.
And what happened to “Lawn Boy” reveals the little room left for nuance or forgiveness in the American political debate. Evison, the author, never meant for his book to be placed in school libraries, he told The Post in an interview. He was surprised when the American Library Association gave “Lawn Boy” an award in 2019 for its appeal to teens. Evison believes that some librarians who chose the novel did so because of the award — and he says that, if any recommended it to lower- or middle-schoolers, they probably confused it with the children’s book “Lawn Boy,” by Gary Paulsen. [/quote]
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Gloomy · F
@AuRevoir In the book an adult remembered a sexual encounter he had with another boy when he was 12 or so. This is not pedophilia but content of a book for older teens or adults.
There are no pseudo intellectual quotes but quotes from researched articles about research on the topic.
I haven't watched your second source but teaching children that different people exist and that people touching them against their will is bad is not grooming. You have fallen into an outrage trap. The same books and sexual education happens in european countries and no one gives a shit cause the majority knows it's not grooming or whatever a conservative narrative tells you.
You reject research on the matter and bought into outrage bait.
There are no pseudo intellectual quotes but quotes from researched articles about research on the topic.
I haven't watched your second source but teaching children that different people exist and that people touching them against their will is bad is not grooming. You have fallen into an outrage trap. The same books and sexual education happens in european countries and no one gives a shit cause the majority knows it's not grooming or whatever a conservative narrative tells you.
You reject research on the matter and bought into outrage bait.
Gloomy · F
@Gloomy Abusive teacher unfortunately exist and If your second source is legit (it's a very politically biased one) then that's terrible but using this to create a strawman of what is going on to build outrage against general education to foster acceptance is repulsive because it weaponizes child abuse.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Gloomy · F
@AuRevoir I'm not from the US so no idea how your classist school system works.
You could read studies, fact check sources, not fall for a narrative that is exactly the same as the satanic panic,....
Grooming is to corece victims without them knowing.
What is happening is just education on different identities and love constelations. You believe in a grooming conspiracy that just doesn't exist.
You could read studies, fact check sources, not fall for a narrative that is exactly the same as the satanic panic,....
Grooming is to corece victims without them knowing.
What is happening is just education on different identities and love constelations. You believe in a grooming conspiracy that just doesn't exist.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Gloomy · F
@AuRevoir You see I do not believe and neither is there substential evidence that Lgbtq education leads to child abuse. Look at other countries who already implemented it like Scotland for example.
Twisting my arguments and claiming they are pro pedophilia is just a sign of how insane this whole discourse in the US has become. I cite articles that aim to disorove your theory that this is a state wide evil issue and you stick to two videos instead of trying to prove I am wrong.
I will always call out pedophilia as every decent person should but teaching kids two men and two women can love each other and that not everyone is cisgender is not grooming or sexual abuse. It's a misinterpretation of what is going on. Not saying evil people can be within the system but what is being taught does not sexualize children.
Twisting my arguments and claiming they are pro pedophilia is just a sign of how insane this whole discourse in the US has become. I cite articles that aim to disorove your theory that this is a state wide evil issue and you stick to two videos instead of trying to prove I am wrong.
I will always call out pedophilia as every decent person should but teaching kids two men and two women can love each other and that not everyone is cisgender is not grooming or sexual abuse. It's a misinterpretation of what is going on. Not saying evil people can be within the system but what is being taught does not sexualize children.