Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

SCOTUS Overturns Bump Stock Ban

Thomas wrote the majority opinion, and correctly pointed out that bump stocks do not convert semi-automatic rifles into machine guns. The mechanism re-engages the trigger so that it still fires one shot at a time.

And the ATF had stressed the same thing for many years...it does not convert a semi-automatic into a machine gun.

Dissenters: Kagan, Jackson, and Sotomayor claimed a rifle equipped with a bump stock can fire at a rate of 400 to 800 rounds per minute and "textual evidence presented shows that a bump-stock-outfitted weapon is a machine gun."

Textual evidence? First off, real world numbers put the rate of fire between 250-300 rounds per minute...not that libs ever miss out on an opportunity to stretch the truth in pursuit of their agenda. Their real problem is that "rate of fire" does not define whether or not a firearm is fully automatic.

And you can always count on the left using one of their classic gun control gaslight cliches...
"...bump stocks, which are accessories of war that have no place in our communities."

Me waiting for an example where military personnel have used bump stocks in combat? 😴
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TexChik · F
Did they? Awesome! You can go through a 30-round mag in just a few seconds with one, and they are fun to shoot. Now I can get mine out of hiding and claim them again!
@TexChik 🥳

I didn't even realize the issue was on SCOTUS's agenda. Per Thomas, Congress will have to pass legislation to get them banned...so, you know they'll try. But they can't use the argument, that the bump stock converts the rifle into a machine gun.
TexChik · F
@BizSuitStacy Trump banned them with an EO after that nutjob shot a bunch of people in CO with several bump stock rifles.
AmericanAvenger · 56-60, M
@TexChik Glad I never gave mine up - and now there are so many more dryfronts running around...
@TexChik Yep. One of the few times I've disagreed with Trump.
TexChik · F
@BizSuitStacy He was trying to keep the libs off his back. That and the people he initially trusted his first time through were my disagreements.