This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
BetweenKittensandRiots · 36-40, MVIP
It's good to see Texans on board with this. Those of you who are on the right should take note that after Roe Vs Wade there was an enormous drop in the crime rate and you may argue correlation is not causation but personally what other cause makes sense? I mean if mothers who can't afford to raise their kids were suddenly given the option to get rid of them and those that couldn't afford the children were given other means to deal with it It would contribute much less to the crime rate because we know Crimes are committed often by the poor.. a child growing up to parents who are poor is more likely to commit crimes. Or at least get caught for them....
Causation makes intuitive sense. and the thing about arguing correlation is not causation is that those arguing it are obligated to argue some OTHER Cause.
http://freakonomics.com/2005/05/15/abortion-and-crime-who-should-you-believe/
Causation makes intuitive sense. and the thing about arguing correlation is not causation is that those arguing it are obligated to argue some OTHER Cause.
http://freakonomics.com/2005/05/15/abortion-and-crime-who-should-you-believe/