Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Vote for what you want America

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
"confined" who blocks me says
Universal health care is and has been a disaster.
Just the opposite. In the US, we pay about DOUBLE what people pay in other developed nations, and we get shorter life expectancies in return.

Kinda looks like there might be room for improvement, wouldn't you say?
Note the graph goes 1970-2018.
Source: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/life-expectancy-vs-health-expenditure

Nope. Infant mortality doesn't explain the discrepancy. That's worse in the US as well.
Source: https://ourworldindata.org/us-life-expectancy-low
JollyRoger · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues Agreed! It appears though that @Confined is still peeking at you.

There are many causes for the results shown on thise charts. Foremost to me is nutrition: The poorer folk in the USA are not educated toward a good diet - Television tells them what they should eat and you don't see 'good foodstuffs' being advertised on TV. Secondly, the graph on expenditures may be skewed by the type of 'health-care costs' that are included: Money spent on 'beautification' (ornamental plastic surgery / spa treatments) or chiropractic, orthodontic and repetitive 'hypochrondial' treatments by rich people can move these cost statistics far to the right.

As for Universal Health Care being a 'disaster' just points to the ineffectiveness of how it is administered. It does not mean that the people who need it don't benefit from it.
@JollyRoger The US healthcare system for many years made it more difficult to get preventative care and to be reimbursed for preventative care. I think that's the biggest driver of our higher costs combined with lower life expectancies.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment