This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultUpdate
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

After Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard is the Trump nominee facing the most resistance

There's no evidence that Gabbard is a Russian spy or that she's compromised in any way. The problem is that people think she is. If she's confirmed as the Director of National Intelligence, that means our allies won't share information with us out of concern that she'll pass it along to Putin. It also means that her subordinates - most of whom are patriotic and committed to their jobs - will withhold information from her. Together, this means she won't be able to do her job - a job, I should add, she's not remotely qualified for.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5020625-tulsi-gabbard-trump-cabinet-nominee/

Meanwhile, Pete Hegseth is probably days if not hours from withdrawing his nomination, assuming Trump doesn't withdraw it first. Aside from the sexual assault and mismanagement of funds allegations (neither of which are necessarily disqualifying in this administration), Hegseth appears to have a drinking problem. Trump is a teetotaler and disapproves of drunkards. Reportedly, he's considering nominating Florida Governor Ron DeSantis as Defense Secretary. Trump and DeSantis despise each other, but DeSantis would definitely be confirmed by the Senate. Another option is Iowa Senator Joni Ernst, who is a veteran and already serves on the Armed Forces committee.
Richard65 · M
Here in the UK, we've already had a Republican spokesman being interviewed on the BBC who specifically advised us against sharing information with the USA as, in his words, it's likely to find its way straight to Putin. I've never heard an American say that on TV before.
@NativePortlander1970 The Abraham Accords were started under Obama; all Trump did was sign them. Big whoop, they created a travel agreement between countries that were never at war.

I agree that Trump probably won't send American troops to fight in Ukraine or Israel as his base won't stand for that, but Biden hasn't sent troops there either. It's not like Trump can end those wars on his own. If we cut funding to Ukraine, that just means the EU will pick up the slack. That could also allow Ukraine to escalate attacks in Russia, which Biden prevented as a condition of them getting aid from us. Without that restriction, Zelensky can do whatever the EU lets him do. As for Israel, our support will continue same as it has under Biden.
@LeopoldBloom They stalled under Obama, where they got hostile once again with each other, Trump got them back to the table, think before you write.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Elessar · 26-30, M
that means our allies won't share information with us out of concern that she'll pass it along to Putin

Damn right, we could never share secrets with someone who may be a Russian asset

Only with the president who used to store nuclear secrets in the bathroom
Ynotisay · M
I wouldn't say there's no evidence. And that's outside of her regularly consuming Russian state media (confirmed by staffers) and then regurgitating the talking points. She's consistently sided with Russia and Syria over a host of issues. And she's loved in Russia. I don't know if she's a 'spy' but I do know, based on her comments, where her sympathies lies.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Honestly, I'm not sure why people expect Gabbard will meet with all that much resistance. She's not any more unqualified than most of Trump's picks, and Trump has the same issues vis a vis Putin that she does.
Ynotisay · M
@MistyCee The resistance isn't just coming from Democrats. Something like 100 intelligence officials, diplomats and security officials are asking the Senate for a closed door meeting. I would imagine there's a reason for that. She's a 43 year old with exactly ZERO intelligence experience. That alone should disqualify her.
@Ynotisay
And a lot of those folks have concerns about Trump. I get the idea of closed door meetings, but is it closed to Trump, and/or, is it really about Trump?

Also, what about this "military intelligence subcommittee" she served on?
Ynotisay · M
@MistyCee From what I was able to gather she was on three Congressional committees. Foreign Affairs, Armed Services and Homeland Security. Not that it matters. Serving on a committee in the House isn't a huge deal.
She has zero intelligence experience yet is in a position to head 18 different intelligence agencies. Including the CIA and DIA.
This meeting in question has nothing to do with Trump. It has everything to do with her. And it's being called for a reason.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
It sounds like our allies already don't trust us to put the right people in so it's a non issue.

Too bad for you not liking Trump's picks but you gotta remember that most departments are going into the shrinky dink machine anyway.

Most intel is just bs anyway.
GrinNude · 61-69, C
But would Jodi Ernst swear fealty to Trump first or obey her oath of office to uphold the Constitution?
Dino11 · M
Enjoy Trump 2.0
@Dino11 Looking forward to it
And this attitude by the dems is the precise reason why kackler lost.

 
Post Comment