This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
TexChik · F
It's not a big deal . But... it's the only thing a desperate democrat party has to cling to ... in an attempt to discredit and deligitimize president Trump. It's pathetic and ultimately BS...
TexChik · F
@Pherick you seemed to be just fine when obama was secretly dealing with the Russians , actually getting caught on open Mic . Or that obama admin officials took campaign contributions from them, or that HRC as sec state sold Russia 20% of our plutonium . The attorney Trump Jr met with worked with the democrats ... who let her into the country .
And there is nothing wrong with meeting with anyone , especially one who claimed to have important info .
And there is nothing wrong with meeting with anyone , especially one who claimed to have important info .
Pherick · 41-45, M
@TexChik Freedom of Speech? If that's what you are trying to claim this is, you really have no idea what the 1st Amanedant says or how the courts have interpreted it.
Having your opinions about the president is fine, I think you are wrong, but that's fine. US is all about open opinions. However when you stick your head in the sand when clear evidence has been produced that a current president has colluded with a foreign government to get that position, every American, no matter their politics should be up in arms. For someone who seems to style themselves a patriot, you seem the farthest thing from it now.
Having your opinions about the president is fine, I think you are wrong, but that's fine. US is all about open opinions. However when you stick your head in the sand when clear evidence has been produced that a current president has colluded with a foreign government to get that position, every American, no matter their politics should be up in arms. For someone who seems to style themselves a patriot, you seem the farthest thing from it now.
TexChik · F
@Pherick there is NO evidence of anything except that you libs want to make it illegal for anyone to defeat you In an election . Clearly you have no concept of case law regarding the first amendment .
Trump broke no laws . Hillary can not make that claim . Obama allowed the Russians free access thinking Hillary would win ... now they are going to have to explain things to the special prosecutor .
Trump broke no laws . Hillary can not make that claim . Obama allowed the Russians free access thinking Hillary would win ... now they are going to have to explain things to the special prosecutor .
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
@Pherick TexChick is always the most outlandish conservatoid here...aside from questionweaver ...they are so far beyond what they deflect onto other people it is actually quite disturbing.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@JaggedLittlePill We actually agreed once, it was insane, I thought I had eaten some shrooms or something :)
JaggedLittlePill · 46-50, F
@Pherick hahahaha that is amazing!