Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Hey Leftist US Democrats - How You Like Your Investigations NOW?

Well, well...President Obama KNEW in AUGUST 2016 about Russian interference in your election. What did he do about it? NOTHING. Why? Cause he thought HRC would win. Or was that part of the "flexability" he promised Russian President Medvedev he would show Putin if he was reelected? Who is colluding with whom? I am not making that up - I am quoting Democrat members of your Congress. HRC helped approve the sale of 21 percent of your uranium resources to a firm with RUSSIAN connections - and her rapist husband was shortly after paid FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS for a speech he gave within weeks in Moscow. I wonder what the topic was - seducing dumb 21 year old girls or raping woman who trusted him then getting away with it?

And not to forget you Bernie Sander "socialists", Mrs. Sanders is now under FBI investigation for BANK FRAUD worth millions of dollars. Maybe she can seek refuge in the 600,000 USD summer house Bernie "socialism for thee but not for me" Sanders bought in 2016. You think any of you teary eyed "socialists" who adore your socialist hero will ever get one of those for yourself...or be invited to see the inside of Bernie's? Probably never once the Sander's are compelled to repay the people they defrauded!

Well leftists, to paraphrase Obama, "If you like your Senate investigations and special consuls, you can keep your Senate investigations and special councils."

Enjoy them.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Clemency · 36-40, F
I realize you're a troll but here goes:
www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/06/obama_s_response_to_russian_interference_he_did_his_job.html


According to the U.S. intelligence community’s Jan. 6 assessment, Vladimir Putin’s long-term goal in directing the interference campaign was to “undermine public faith in the US democratic process.” Obama responded accordingly. “We set out from a first-order principle that required us to defend the integrity of the vote,” Obama’s former chief of staff, Denis McDonough, told the Post. Russia’s hacks and leaks were bad, but corruption of voter rolls and election tallies would be far worse. So the Obama administration focused on alerting state officials, fortifying cyberdefenses, and privately threatening Russia with retaliation.

Why didn’t Obama raise public alarms about Russian infiltration? Because that might have backfired. “Trump was predicting that the election would be rigged,” says the Post. “Obama officials feared providing fuel to such claims, playing into Russia’s efforts to discredit the outcome.” According to the paper, Obama and his team “worried that any action they took would be perceived as political interference in an already volatile campaign.” Rather than speak up when the CIA first warned him about Putin’s moves, Obama waited for “a high-confidence assessment from U.S. intelligence agencies on Russia’s role and intent.” He asked congressional Republicans to join him in cautioning citizens and state election officials. You can argue that this was politically naïve. But Obama wasn’t playing politics. He was trying to unite the country.

The accusation about HRC and the uranium deal has been debunked 1000 times. I suppose you believe she has a child trafficking ring in the basement of a pizza parlor too. 🙄

Why do you not care that your president lied to you about Russia intervening in our election? The US Intelligence informed him in August 2016, and he's denied it the whole time. Why is this acceptable for you?
SW-User
@Clemency: first off using the term trolling instantly discredits you secondly bill Clinton did have parties in the White House with young boys they got from human traffickers so it would surpise me if Hillary is involved
Clemency · 36-40, F
@Dumbbutfunctional: I call it as I see it.

And you need to read a book.
SW-User
@Clemency: I'm currently reading a checkered past by William van poyck very interesting book
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@Clemency: You know more than Congressman Adam Schiff, Democrat, on the intelligence committee who has criticized Obama in exactly the way I have? I did not know your intelligence clearance was that high; give him a call,you might wish to clue him in and show him where he is wrong. And the uranium deal has NEVER been debunked nor can you show me where it has been because it happened. As I believe your hero also once said "Facts are a difficult thing" as you and your kind are now finding out.
@Dumbbutfunctional: using the term trolling instantly discredits you....

Really? But talking about "Bill Clinton having parties in the white house with young boys" ...does not?

Hahahahaahahaha I love this place....it is like my very own version of smoking crack.
SW-User
@underyourskin: Russian untouchables were brought in for an party but those are the things that die down quickly so people like you wouldn't know