Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Would N. Korea be better off if the Allies left Asia to the Japanese?

Poll - Total Votes: 2
Yes
No
Hard to say. I don't think N. Korea has comfort women, but they have little of anything else
Hard to say. Other
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
....
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Gauntlets28 · 26-30, M
The Imperial wartime Japanese? God no, they'd be just as bad. Maybe worse.
@Gauntlets28: by now though?
Gauntlets28 · 26-30, M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP: I feel like the only way they could've left Asia to the Japanese is if they hadn't attacked Pearl Harbour, Shanghai and the like anyway and drawn the Allies into the Pacific.
So if Japan didn't go to war with the Allies at all, it might not have had the kind of wartime shortages they suffered from, and had a stronger hold on Asia. Nevertheless, I don't think they could possibly have kept them longterm, since the general mistreatment of the Koreans by them would've probably created a rebellion against them, possibly leading to a similarly extremist government to what North Korea has now.
Tbh though, I feel like it was almost inevitable that the Japanese would've gone to war with the Allies eventually. There were too many colonies there at the time, and even if the war was limited in Asia, after it had ended in Europe I can imagine the Russians would still have gone into China eventually, leading to events not dissimilar to our Korean War, although perhaps with the Japanese on the South Korean side.
@Gauntlets28: there are a number of ways the war could have gone very differently. Remember how reluctant the Americas were to get involved before Pearl Harbor? What if Hitler got the bomb? Anyway, the question was a what-if not a how-if
Gauntlets28 · 26-30, M
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP: I like the how-if though... and besides, the how-if can drastically change the what-if.