Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Susan Rice: sneakerleaker?

Not so sneaky since she signed the log verifying she saw the intel she leaked.

White House lawyers last month discovered that the former national security adviser Susan Rice requested the identities of U.S. persons in raw intelligence reports on dozens of occasions that connect to the Donald Trump transition and campaign, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter. The pattern of Rice's requests was discovered in a National Security Council review of the government's policy on "unmasking" the identities of individuals in the U.S. who are not targets of electronic eavesdropping, but whose communications are collected incidentally. Normally those names are redacted from summaries of monitored conversations and appear in reports as something like "U.S. Person One." The National Security Council's senior director for intelligence, Ezra Cohen-Watnick, was conducting the review, according to two U.S. officials who spoke with Bloomberg View on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly. In February Cohen-Watnick discovered Rice's multiple requests to unmask U.S. persons in intelligence reports that related to Trump transition activities. He brought this to the attention of the White House General Counsel's office, who reviewed more of Rice's requests and instructed him to end his own research into the unmasking policy.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2017/04/03/report-susan-rice-directed-unmasking-n2307858

[image deleted]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Yup, you cracked the case! Have you called the FBI? They clearly don't have this information when Comey said, "There is no evidence"
katielass · F
You must have missed the on air interview with a former obama advisor who stated on msnbc that she told the WH to hurry and collect as much info on trump and co before obama left the wh because if trump found out how they got that info there would be big trouble. That on air admission they were surveilling trump and co is about as clear evidence as can be had. But you go ahead and pretend it doesn't exist. As long as it's your side doing the crime, it's fine.
Well, on the one hand, I don't know what you mean by my side. On the other hand, if you actually watched the interview you would know she said nothing of the sort and that the video you are describing is a broadly spread forgery, a cobbling and editing of the clips to fit a false narrative and has been hilariously debunked. The substance of her point was that the Obama administration wanted to preserve as much information on the Russian election interference before Trump could bury it. Watch it again, the real version, I regularly watch MSNBC, I saw the original, did you?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@WonderingWhileWandering:

Oh you regularly watch MSNBC you must be right bwhaaaaaaaa!
In this case yes, because I watched the interview on MSNBC, not the troll copies Trump supporters made.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@WonderingWhileWandering:


Ummmmm. MSNBC heavily edited it. Surely you're not THAT naive 😂
@Jackjjacksonjr: You do know that you are quoting a made up source right? This is intentional misinformation you are spreading? I mean I just assume that you are just a horrible person and not actually dumb enough to believe this. Maybe I am wrong. Which is it?
Oh my fucking god...you believe this shit don't you. Whoa. whoa. whoa. Coal jobs coming back? So much winning? Mexico will pay for the wall? You believe all of it?
katielass · F
@WonderingWhileWandering: Oh, so when you don't like the evidence it becomes a forgery. Listen to yourself. You're just about ready for the loony bin. Maybe they can finish that lobotomy.
YOU DO BELIEVE IT! HOLY SHIT. This is amazing. I thought most of you had figured out that you were duped by a con man by now, but I guess there are some hold outs.
katielass · F
@WonderingWhileWandering: I'm not one of the ones who was called easily manipulated and too stupid to know it. That would be you, and for once, she was right. Go figure. Now don;t bother me again, i don't like talking to the insane.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@WonderingWhileWandering:

Nice try. Changing the subject doesn't work. That tactic is employed by your ilk when you're unable to re,Ottley contrive a reasoned response.

katielass · F
@Jackjjacksonjr: No, wait Jack. He's right. Susan Rice is a Russian agent sent here to spoil our election. And she altered the tape and is causing all the confusion.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@katielass:

It's a he?
katielass · F
@Jackjjacksonjr: ID really, I just assumed someone that utterly stupid had to be a man. (ducks head) lmfaooooooooooo...jk
therighttothink50 · 56-60, M
@WonderingWhileWandering: If you regularly watch MSNBC, you are either brain dead or you have a deep hatred for the United States. The pile of crap they spew for the statist government is really worse than Pravda or Baghdad Bob.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@therighttothink50: