Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What do you think about Trump's proposed budget cuts or the American First Policy choices?

There is a lot of news at the moment about the proposed budget cuts, which haven't yet been approved by congress. A lot of the world is freaking out because they see it as a first step of the US withdrawing from its global role.

There is a lot of crying about the cutting of funding to the UN and the World Bank. Though the US is still the biggest single funder of both even after the proposed budget cuts.

There is the reduction of military fundings to countries like Egypt, Pakistan, and many others. Shouldn't they be responsible for their own funding? The US has a huge national debt that isn't going away. Is it not irresponsible for someone to give away money that they don't have?

Should the government of the US not always have a American's first policy seeing as it is a government for the people by the people?

There is a lot of crying about the cut climate change funding from the US too. Here I am torn. Our understanding of climate change is very limited and there is a lot of speculation about what the long reaching effects will be. The reality is that the US is already pretty active with regulations preventing pollution and reducing carbon emissions. The pressure should be put on the new polluters, China, Thailand, India... Where it is now going to make the most difference for the cost.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Goralski · 51-55, M
The world thinks its their fuckin money for some reason ....should have cut Israel's also
Well, I support Israel so I disagree with you there. The funding to Israel is about more than the money, though the money helps. It shows that the US is invested in Israel and will not tolerate it's annihilation. The survival of Israel depends on their military power. Also, Israel offers many benefits to the US in terms of intelligence and arms development and technology.

But I agree with the rest of your comment.
Goralski · 51-55, M
@MarsSword: Israel offers absolutely no benefits to the US except to make indirect campaign donations to members of congress
@Goralski: You are definately wrong about that. The Israeli government shares a lot of intelligence with the US.
Xuan12 · 31-35, M
@MarsSword: Like about those WMDs that never materialized? I also checked the rolls for coalition members in both Afghanistan and Iraq. No Israelis. They aren't helping on the ground. And it would seem that their bad intel sparked off the whole mess in Iraq and Syria. I don't know what the ROI on whatever Israel does is...but it doesn't look good.
@Xuan12: I think most of what Israel does is behind the scenes and you wouldn't ever hear off it. Because neither the Israelis or the Americans would tell you besides the fact that they have both said there is a significant amount of intelligence sharing.

Israelis cannot really be a part of the coalition, due to their history with other middle eastern countries those countries would not believe that they are there to help and would not be willing to work with Israel on the basis of ideology. It would be very counter productive.

The WMDs were thought to be there by British, American, and Israeli sources... They were all wrong in that instant.