Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What do you think about Trump's proposed budget cuts or the American First Policy choices?

There is a lot of news at the moment about the proposed budget cuts, which haven't yet been approved by congress. A lot of the world is freaking out because they see it as a first step of the US withdrawing from its global role.

There is a lot of crying about the cutting of funding to the UN and the World Bank. Though the US is still the biggest single funder of both even after the proposed budget cuts.

There is the reduction of military fundings to countries like Egypt, Pakistan, and many others. Shouldn't they be responsible for their own funding? The US has a huge national debt that isn't going away. Is it not irresponsible for someone to give away money that they don't have?

Should the government of the US not always have a American's first policy seeing as it is a government for the people by the people?

There is a lot of crying about the cut climate change funding from the US too. Here I am torn. Our understanding of climate change is very limited and there is a lot of speculation about what the long reaching effects will be. The reality is that the US is already pretty active with regulations preventing pollution and reducing carbon emissions. The pressure should be put on the new polluters, China, Thailand, India... Where it is now going to make the most difference for the cost.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
What is the global role of the U.S.?
Well currently, supplying a lot of the funding for international organizations, supporting the development of other countries and their defense, attempting to stabilize the global economy.

Is that role sustainable though? Where is the money coming from?
SW-User
@MarsSword: Agreed,so why do people bitch about America so much? Maybe we should take our ball and go home and put America first. Let's see how the globalists like it.
@kingfish2: Because people only see the failures. The Iraqs and the Syrias. Which to be fair were not entirely to be blame on the American's by a long shot. Though America had a role in producing the environment and the destabilization.

It would be better for the American budget to pack up and head home. The military spending abroad could be redistributed to properly take care of the veterans and supporting economic growth within the US.

The scary part though is the scale of the American war machine in the American economy. Multi billion dollar companies like Lockheed that sell weapons and arms. Companies that have a financial investment in war.
SW-User
@MarsSword: Agreed.
SW-User
@kingfish: our global role is to spread democracy and Jesus.
SW-User
@Nonsequitur: Disagree.
@Nonsequitur: Jesus is out of it now. America is no longer a Christian nation. Democracy...maybe.
SW-User
@kingfish2: oh and the oil...Can't forget that.
I don't give a fuck if you disagree or not..Pull your head out of your ass and look at the US role around the globe since the mass production of the car....

We can't shut it down now...We created the monster.
SW-User
@MarsSword: read your history..

We never were a xtian nation...But we certainly leveraged the name.
@Nonsequitur: I do read rather a lot of history. The nation of the USA was originally founded upon Christian beliefs about morality and liberty, and at the time it was a primarily Christian nation.

Whether or not we can shut it down is a worthwhile question. It kinda looks like some people might be headed in that direction. I have another question here about the influence of private military related companies and how that prevents some changes...
SW-User
@MarsSword: you should read more.
@Nonsequitur: Those beliefs had some serious issues that are still being worked out. Slavery being one of the most obvious, but still...
SW-User
@MarsSword: read John Adams.
@Nonsequitur: I should get around to that some time. John Adams was an atheist as far as I know. But he still lived by the christian morality of the time by en large.
SW-User
@MarsSword: the prevailing philosophy evident in the early documents was deism.
@Nonsequitur: Perhaps, but that doesn't change the fact that the majority of the founders were christian and all of them lived by an idea of christian morality and values.
SW-User
@MarsSword: does "god" appear in the Constitution?
@Nonsequitur: I am not sure what you are trying to prove.
SW-User
@MarsSword: of course you don't! Some may have been Christians. However, great effort was made to create a secular state.
@Nonsequitur: A secular state yes. I was not denying that. I was simply stating that America was a primarily Christian nation at the time which is why it was referred to as such. I was also saying that many of the tenancies of the secular state of America are based off of Christian ideas of morality and liberty.
SW-User
@MarsSword: what you have been spoon fed growing up isn't the case. that's all i am saying.
@Nonsequitur: Is what I just said in the comment above wrong?
SW-User
@MarsSword: they were not what you would consider "Republican voter right wing southern Baptist types".
@Nonsequitur: I am not going to keep arguing a moot point. Whether or not the US ever was a 'christian nation' however you want to define that. It isn't now.
SW-User
@MarsSword: i have actual time in the discipline of history at a professional level. I wanted this nonsense exchange over before you did!

It is a commonly held myth that we were founded as a Christian nation.
All I ask is that you read before you post uninformed posts.

Last post