Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Will the POTUS be impeached over the Russian links?

And if the corruption is proven, will his supporters accept it as fair?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Cierzo · M
Maybe/No
The relevant question is 'Why are liberals and leftists who claim Trump is a fascist so fond of deep state (that nobody has elected) right now?. Who are the real fascists?'
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
I think its relevent if he did collude with the Russian deep state to help him win the election. The Russian deep state is also non-elected and the Russian non-deep state is er... questionable. You can hardly give him martyrdom under those circumstance.

Do I like the FBI, CIA or their British equivalents? Nope. But as a leftist its fun to see my enemies collide.
Cierzo · M
@Burnley123: I think in a way it would be good if Trump is impeached and removed...it would make millions of people worldwide wake up and realise once and for all that this thing called representative democracy is a miserable lie, and it only works as a way to make the establishment puppets look respectable.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Cierzo: If Trump is found to have colluded with Putin If he knew about hacking and his campaign coordinated their campaign with Russia; would you see that as fair?
Cierzo · M
@Burnley123: I have no problem at all with it.
Clinton was in collusion with the Saudis, much worse than Russia in my opinion.
Everyone is free to make their own international alliances.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Cierzo: Reasonable point about the Saudi's. I see this less as an issue about a foreign power, more about corrupt practice. Hacking a opponents campaign is a modern Watergate. Obviously the DNC are also corrupt and that was one of the main things revealed. Still, hacking your opponents private data should not be fair electoral practice.
Cierzo · M
@Burnley123: I agree on that. But is it really about hacking? I just hear rants about the Russians
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Cierzo: I have said all along (and even posted questions to say) that evidence should be public for it to be acted upon. All we have now is smoke and mirrors. It is VERY thick smoke and VERY shiny mirrors but nonetheless we need hard proof. I think evidence probably exists but we need to see it.