Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Donald Trump now rules by Executive Order.

Is this what you [b]expected[/b] would happen when you could not be bothered to cast a ballot in 2016? (A half of all eligible voters did not vote at the last election). When you take freedom for granted the first thing you learn is [b]how easily it can be taken away from you[/b]. Next time you can make a difference, turn out for freedom, [b]and vote[/b].
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Bean17 · 46-50, F
I was bothered to cast a ballot and it didn't make a difference.
will999 · 70-79, M
Hello Bean17.[b] Your ballot counts for something[/b] even if many disagree with you [b]this time[/b]. In a democracy ballots are the government's only claim to legitimacy. Trump won by appealing to the disillusioned and the disgruntled. That will be his undoing. He is headed for impeachment.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@will999: the President win simply because he was not Mrs Clinton.

[image deleted]
Bean17 · 46-50, F
@will999: More people agreed with me than not and yet still...
katielass · F
@will999: I believe Hillary said it was the democrat voters who are easily manipulated. The only time that hag told the truth. Now swallow it. You're not smarter or better than anyone. In fact, if you had the brains to see how you've been used and abused you'd have been "disgruntled" as well.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Bean17:

[image deleted]
will999 · 70-79, M
@Jackjjacksonjr: Hello. It may be true that the American voters have turned against the Clintons for some reason but that does not necessarily mean that Trump's government will be successful. In 2007 the Australian voters threw out the Liberal Party and voted for the Labour opposition. The Australian voters had grown a little tired of John Howard. In spite of John Howard's excellent political instincts he was seen as being a little bit stubborn and he lost that election to the Labour opposition led by Kevin Rudd. My main point is that Labour [b]won the election but was unable to govern[/b] due to internal division. During his first term as leader Kevin Rudd's deputy, Julia Gillard, announced that she would challenge him for the leadership. Rudd fought back and regained the leadership of his party but by this time the Labour Party had lost the voters. Trump does not have the full support of his own party does he? Trump's opponents are not all Corrupt, Lying, Incompetent, Narcissistic, two faced and Offensive Democrats.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@will999: so far 99.9% of republicans in congress support the president and a minority of democrats. Why are you creating drama that doesn't exist?

[image deleted]
will999 · 70-79, M
Hi again Jackjjacksonjr. Trump has yet to convince the judicial authorities that his executive orders are constitutional. Or do you maintain that that they are all Corrupt, Lying, Incompetent, Narcissistic, two faced and Offensive as well?
will999 · 70-79, M
@Jackjjacksonjr: 99.9% of republicans in congress support Trump? Maybe you should inform Google of this astonishing fact, they put the figure a bit lower than that. Maybe it is because they are all Corrupt, Lying, Incompetent, Narcissistic, two faced and Offensive Democrats also. They're everywhere aren't they? There is probably a few under your bed, with all the reds.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@will999: the courts will ultimately uphold the EO's. Not sure what else you're rambling and ranting about lol? You forgot how to use bold already? 😂
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@will999: you'll be apoplectic when the Supreme Court Justice gets confirmed. That will be fun. The republicans in Congress are behind the President. You only wish they were in disarray like Pelosi et al. If the Dems were smart (as if) they would have replaced the old bet with someone young with better ideas but I digress.
will999 · 70-79, M
@Jackjjacksonjr: By the way, Text-Within-Image devices designed to thwart automated site moderation are uncool because they allow [b]you[/b] to break the rules of common decency and ordinary respect for others who have a different opinion to you. I am not sure the other SW members would allow you to get away with saying [b]IN TEXT[/b] what your Text-Within-Image device suggests what[b] C-L-I-N-T-O-N[/b] means.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@will999: So you do remember how to use the bold feature. Impressive.