Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If the rewards are high, and the chance of being caught is low, people will cheat.

Experimental evidence

A 2022 study in Scientific Reports found that financial incentives increase cheating, but only when there is a positive probability of detection. When the probability of detection was reduced to zero, the magnitude of cheating rose sharply for those receiving piece‑rate incentives
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
. This supports the idea that low detection risk combined with high rewards strongly boosts dishonesty.

Psychological drivers
Cheating is not purely rational cost‑benefit analysis. Even when rewards are small, some people cheat because they experience a “cheater’s high” — a self‑satisfaction or pleasure from breaking rules
PsyBlog
PsyBlog
. This means that low detection risk can also remove the fear of consequences, making the emotional payoff more attractive.

Social and situational factors
Stanford research shows that people are more likely to cheat when they believe “everyone else is cheating” or fear falling behind if they follow the rules
STANFORD magazine
STANFORD magazine
. In high‑reward, low‑risk contexts, these rationalizations become easier.

Key conditions that increase cheating risk

High potential gain (financial, status, or personal satisfaction)

Low probability of detection (or perceived low risk)

Perceived fairness breakdown (others cheating, rules seen as arbitrary)

Personal traits (entitlement, competitive drive, or desire for self‑satisfaction)

Why the combination matters
When rewards are high, the potential benefit is large. When detection risk is low, the cost of cheating is minimal. This combination removes both the material and emotional barriers to dishonesty, making cheating more likely. However, even without high rewards, some people cheat for intrinsic satisfaction, and even with high rewards, some refrain due to moral constraints or social norms.

This post is about ballot harvesting....
Top | New | Old
Ilya8191 · 16-17, MNew
Do you know Iran?! An 18-year-old boy from Iran is ready to expand your knowledge about Iran.
SumKindaMunster · 56-60, M
@Ilya8191 Do go on. Tell us about Iran.
Thinkerbell · 46-50, F
Somali Medicaid/Medicare fraud in Minnesota 101, at least as long as Biden and Walz were in office.
trollslayer · 51-55, M
How does the penalty if caught factor in?
SumKindaMunster · 56-60, M
@trollslayer I'm mentioning ballot harvesting from the institutional side, less so from the individual perspective. It behooves the party in power to engage in ballot harvesting to ensure the preferred candidates are victorious. Since it is legal, the risks are obviously very low. So the chance of cheating is high.

Yes, a good example of this anecdotally is the New England Patriots under Bill Belechick or Lance Armstrong.

Both were highly successful in their chosen field and didn't necessarily need to cheat to win...but they did anyway....
trollslayer · 51-55, M
@SumKindaMunster the alaska case may be another good example.

Probably not illegal, but definitely underhanded. The risk is bad PR (or good depending on how you view it), but the chance of it making a difference seems quite low.
SumKindaMunster · 56-60, M
@trollslayer Yeah good example. Not illegal, but sneaky and underhanded.

Of course, what does this also say about voters who can't distinguish a Democrat from a Republican regardless of the name on the ballot?

 
Post Comment