SatanBurger · 36-40, F
The main reason I say no is because abortion bans and anti abortion laws are often associated with lack of women's health care and maternal care in developing worlds who also have religious theocratic laws. The same will happen to the US because it's all linked. Those that are ignorant on the subject of abortion also don't support women's health so with the disappearance of abortion is also going to be the disappearance on women's health. Almost every country that has abortion bans also have higher infant and women all cause mortality rates. To look at the future consequences, you got to look at pro lifers overall views of women, religion, health and rights in general to know what it is like.
In the US, with anti abortion laws we already have higher maternal death rates among all developed countries. It wouldn't be like this if we had abortion plus lower child care cost, affordable health and better public services as well as free contraceptives and overall focus on health.
Also, pregnancy is super high risk. There's 300 diseases that can develop while pregnant not to mention mental illness. Pregnancy is extremely high risk and many women who get abortion one time, doesn't mean they don't have kids in the future. It's for this reason that highly ignorant people shouldn't be in charge of our abortion laws because they know little.
In the US, with anti abortion laws we already have higher maternal death rates among all developed countries. It wouldn't be like this if we had abortion plus lower child care cost, affordable health and better public services as well as free contraceptives and overall focus on health.
Also, pregnancy is super high risk. There's 300 diseases that can develop while pregnant not to mention mental illness. Pregnancy is extremely high risk and many women who get abortion one time, doesn't mean they don't have kids in the future. It's for this reason that highly ignorant people shouldn't be in charge of our abortion laws because they know little.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
They're pulling out uteruses cuz dead foetus is more beloved than live lady in USA!!!
justbob · 61-69, M
Much good would come of that. Fewer dead babies and those who would commit such a monstrous and barbaric act facing consequences.
Adstar · 56-60, M
Any law that would prevent the slaughter of innocent little ones in the womb would be a wonderful thing.. Those who take part in and support the murder of innocents should be opposed..
Northwest · M
You're a little over 4 years too late. The U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, in the ruling Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
View 6 more replies »
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
@Waveney there was a woman that was stalked and viciously pursued by a weirdo conservative politician because she crossed state lines to have an abortion. He followed her relentlessly like a slaver and even found the hospitals she visited
So it might as well be a federal ban
So it might as well be a federal ban
Northwest · M
@SatanBurger Technology makes this possible and some overzealous prosecutors may go the Handsmaid's route.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
MoveAlong · 70-79, M
No woman should be forced to use her blood and body to sustain the life of another.
Rabbit420 · M
@MoveAlong Especially if it's a fetus that was created by rape or incest!!!! Of course there are all these Pro-lifers that are willing to adopt and support every unwanted child for 18 years or more. 😂😂😂😂😂 Fat chance of that ever happening!!!!! I've got a better chance of winning the lottery 3 times before that will ever happen!!!!
Unless you’re pregnant and have to make that decision it’s really no one’s business.
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
HikingMan · 56-60, M
In a society that values privacy and autonomy, in a land where men impregnate woman and then leave and often go on for years or forever without paying child support, In a country where the legal system pays little mind and under punishes rapists, and Judges have been quoted as saying things like "We shouldn't ruin his life for one mistake..." AT a time when it costs an average of $35,000 a year to raise a single child...
None of what is being proposed makes any sense at all.
And please, people..., don't come at me with your religion, because this is the land of religious freedom and your religion matters not as a matter of law or even true morality...
It's all bunk!
None of what is being proposed makes any sense at all.
And please, people..., don't come at me with your religion, because this is the land of religious freedom and your religion matters not as a matter of law or even true morality...
It's all bunk!
Rabbit420 · M

Atari2678 · 41-45, M
I feel that does not have to be the answer to it .







