Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Europe unites behind Greenland — 'stands firm' against Trump annexation push

AlterNet.org reports:

By Alex Henderson

In Europe, opposition to U.S. President Donald Trump's proposed annexation of Greenland is so widespread that even right-wing Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is expressing her opposition. And on Monday, CNBC reports, "European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Europe stands firmly with Greenland as Trump renews his push for U.S. control of the territory."

CNBC's Sam Meredith reports that von der Leyen "announced a fresh funding boost for Greenland, seeking to shore up Arctic ties with the self-governing Danish territory amid U.S. President Donald Trump's annexation drive."

"Speaking alongside Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen," Meredith explains, "the EU chief said the 200-million-euro ($232.3 million) funding package reflects 'a clear choice' by Greenland to strengthen ties with the 27-nation bloc. The funds, which is to be invested this year and in 2027, is designed to bolster ties between the EU and the Arctic, with Von der Leyen describing Greenland as 'a strategic ally and a trusted friend.'"

Nielsen didn't mince words on Monday, saying, "The European Union continues to be, not only an important partner for Greenland, but also, a loyal and trusted friend … Through these challenging times, your support to us is unfailing. You have stood by us and continue to stand by us. We feel it and are deeply grateful. Thank you."

Meredith notes that the Greenland funding package "comes shortly after Icelanders voted to reject restarting EU membership negotiations and as Trump renews his push to acquire Greenland on national security grounds."

When Frederiksen was asked how Trump might react to the funding package, she responded, "We have been under pressure, and it has been very clear. And we are very thankful for the great support that we have received from our European partners — but, by the way, also globally."

The Danish prime minister noted that Denmark would like to work with the U.S. on defense and national security matters, adding, "But we, of course, would also like to work even closer together with our European allies, and that is exactly what we are doing in the Arctic region now."

Meredith reports, "The EU's Von der Leyen said Greenland 'stood firm and stands firm under enormous pressure. Europe is firmly united with you too. This is the basic message,' she added. Trump has long advocated for control of Greenland, a vast, sparsely populated and largely frozen island, but the U.S. president's fixation on the territory became a major trans-Atlantic issue at the start of the year."
Top | New | Old
ArishMell · 70-79, M
Has President Trump ever explained his "national security grounds"?

Given that the nearest part of Greenland is a long way from the USA, that Greenland and Denmark are NATO members and the island already hosts a USAAF base, I wonder how he justifies the "security" claim.

Although it was long before Trump's time as a politician, I wonder too of memories among Greenlanders of the ruthless way that base was imposed on the residents in its way.

" a vast, sparsely populated ... island." How vast? The most common map projection used for world maps tends to distort high-latitude lands, and I have heard people say this makes Greenland look a lot bigger than it really is. It might be more accurate to consider distortion of shape more than of area.

My atlas gives these areas, in square miles:

USA: 3 718 000

Greenland: 840 000

UK: 93 400

Denmark: 16 600

So Greenland is 0.22 X the area of the USA.

And some 50 times the area of Denmark!
Coraline · F
noone is taking him serious anymore.... he lost a war with iran already
@chrisCA Canada and our other allies but you know who he’s pi$$3d off the most???

American voters!
chrisCA · M
@KunsanVeteran True, but Americans won't boycott American products because of Trump
@chrisCA Point taken!

However, if anyone is going to hold the Apricot Antichrist responsible for his crimes, it will have to be American voters.
A good example of why NATO an similar alliances are stupid.

Their own members have completely contradicting geopolitical goals.

 
Post Comment