Section 230 is why Similar worlds is even capable of existing.
Andrew Davis, who owns this corner of the web would not be able to sustain the legal liability of being sued for everything we may or may not choose to Post on this particular corner of the internet, and would be forced to shut down. Which is ironic because Andrew Davis and Similar worlds are not part of "Big Tech." at all, if anything they are small tech.
But they are competition to Big Tech, and that's so crucical. People are being told Section 230 is a Gift to Big tech, but repealing it would be an EVEN BIGGER Gift to big tech because large companies like Facebook can afford to withstand the lawsuits that would result of being held to account for anything their users posted but you know who couldn't?
Similiar worlds, blueskky, other smaller tech platforms.
Facebook would LOVEEEE to see section 230 struck down because it would create huge barriers to entry to compete with them.
But they are competition to Big Tech, and that's so crucical. People are being told Section 230 is a Gift to Big tech, but repealing it would be an EVEN BIGGER Gift to big tech because large companies like Facebook can afford to withstand the lawsuits that would result of being held to account for anything their users posted but you know who couldn't?
Similiar worlds, blueskky, other smaller tech platforms.
Facebook would LOVEEEE to see section 230 struck down because it would create huge barriers to entry to compete with them.
