Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Trump Signs Executive Oder To Put Limit On mail-in voting

Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order that the White House says is aimed at cracking down on mail-in voting.

“It’s about voter integrity, we want to have honest voting in our country because if you don’t have honest voting, you can’t have really a nation,” Trump said after signing the order in the Oval Office.

It’s not clear what authority Trump is relying on to carry out the order — given that states, not the president, have broad authority to run elections. Trump has repeatedly and baselessly argued that US elections are rife with fraud and has sought to require proof of citizenship to vote.

Trump acknowledged the order could be legally challenged by a “rogue” federal judge, but he added, “I don’t see how anybody can challenge it.”

The order also directs the Homeland Security secretary, in coordination with the Social Security Administration commissioner, to compile and transmit “State Citizenship Lists” to the chief election official of each state.

“The State Citizenship List shall be derived from Federal citizenship and naturalization records, SSA records, SAVE data, and other relevant Federal databases,” the order states. “The State Citizenship List shall be updated and transmitted to State election officials no fewer than 60 days before each regularly scheduled Federal election, or promptly upon request by a State in connection with any special Federal election.”

Experts note that noncitizen voting in federal elections already is illegal and is exceedingly rare. Foreigners who cast ballots in presidential or congressional elections risk prosecution and deportation if caught.

White House aide Will Sharf said Tuesday that the order will use federal data to verify eligible voters and direct the United States Postal Service to take new measures to verify that mail-in ballots are being sent to eligible voters and properly returned.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said states will be required to receive a bar code from the USPS that will be placed on mail-in ballot envelopes.

“The states run these elections — if they want to use the US mail, the US Postal Service, they’re going to get a code, a bar code, from the US Postal Service and they’re going to put that on the envelope and we’re going to have one envelope per vote,” Lutnick said, standing behind Trump in the Oval Office.

n recent weeks, the president has demanded that Congress pass a proof-of-citizenship requirement and other changes to election law as part of a bill dubbed the “Save America Act,” but it has failed to gain traction in the Senate.

Trump, who has declared voting by mail cheating, defended his own vote by mail in a recent Florida special election, saying, “Because of the fact that I’m President of the United States.”

States may decide to ignore this order, or the USPS altogether, because EACH ballot has a code unique to the REGISTERED voter and voters must be citizens to receive a main-in ballot.
Top | New | Old
BohoBabe · M
We know that Trump is doing whatever his fascist puppet-masters are telling him. I want to know what Democrats are going to do to stop this. At some point where need to stop blaming the Fascists and start blaming the people who are supposed to be anti-fascist.
BohoBabe · M
@Northwest Article II doesn't actually mention immunity from civil liability. The SCOTUS has decided that based on who was on the bench at the time, but that's not really what it says in the Constitution.

So legally speaking, it would have been possible to arrest Bush. Whether or not that actually would have happened, what the SCOTUS at the time would have said, that's a different issue. Can we agree on that?
Northwest · M
@BohoBabe
Article II doesn't actually mention immunity from civil liability

It's really pointless to continue this discussion. He is immune from both civil and criminal acts, FOR OFFICIAL acts. I gave you the specific case.
BohoBabe · M
@Northwest I don't know what to tell you other than that is incorrect because it doesn't actually say that in the constitution. Even the Republicans claim that it's "implied."
This is why the SCOTUS has different rulings depending on who is on the bench. These people are basically high wizards who decide if the Constitution "implies" something or not.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Northwest · M
@jshm2
In other words. 80% of mail in voting is troops outside the USA.

If the Supreme Court agrees to bend the Constitution to remove the power to decide how elections are conducted from the States.
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
He is only doing this to make objections later. When he pushes it then, the states will object more seriously.

Trump is hoping to take this to court just to say the election is invalid once again.

Delay, delay, delay. And hoping the courts will change. Perhaps through intimidation even.

"I only need x amount of votes". And the redistricting is currently being challenged.

 
Post Comment